2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2010.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary theories of 1/f noise in motor control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
102
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
3
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the social and life sciences alone it has been applied in an increasing number of studies across the different sub-disciplines such as motor development in infants (Assmann, Romano, Thiel, & Niemitz, 2007), parent-child interaction (De Graag, Cox, Hasselman, Jansen, & De Weerth, 2012;Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Hasselman, Cox, & Granic, 2012), syntactic coordination between child and caregiver (Dale & Spivey, 2006), dynamics of motor control (Diniz et al, 2011;Wijnants, Bosman, Cox, Hasselman, & Van Orden, 2011;Wijnants, Bosman, Hasselman, Cox, & Van Orden, 2009), cognitive constraints on postural stability (Shockley, Baker, Richardson, & Fowler, 2007;Shockley, Santana, & Fowler, 2003), eye-movements during conversation (D. C. Richardson, Dale, & Kirkham, 2007), insight in problem solving (Stephen, Dixon, & Isenhower, 2009), and as a novel analysis tool in cognitive neuroscience (Bianciardi et al, 2007;Schinkel, Marwan, & Kürths, 2007, 2009). The quantification measures as used in these studies often take their role as predictors or covariates next to more familiar variables in some statitsical analysis.…”
Section: Interaction Dominant Dynamics Measures: Quantifying Complex mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the social and life sciences alone it has been applied in an increasing number of studies across the different sub-disciplines such as motor development in infants (Assmann, Romano, Thiel, & Niemitz, 2007), parent-child interaction (De Graag, Cox, Hasselman, Jansen, & De Weerth, 2012;Lichtwarck-Aschoff, Hasselman, Cox, & Granic, 2012), syntactic coordination between child and caregiver (Dale & Spivey, 2006), dynamics of motor control (Diniz et al, 2011;Wijnants, Bosman, Cox, Hasselman, & Van Orden, 2011;Wijnants, Bosman, Hasselman, Cox, & Van Orden, 2009), cognitive constraints on postural stability (Shockley, Baker, Richardson, & Fowler, 2007;Shockley, Santana, & Fowler, 2003), eye-movements during conversation (D. C. Richardson, Dale, & Kirkham, 2007), insight in problem solving (Stephen, Dixon, & Isenhower, 2009), and as a novel analysis tool in cognitive neuroscience (Bianciardi et al, 2007;Schinkel, Marwan, & Kürths, 2007, 2009). The quantification measures as used in these studies often take their role as predictors or covariates next to more familiar variables in some statitsical analysis.…”
Section: Interaction Dominant Dynamics Measures: Quantifying Complex mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there is still controversy about the meaning of fractal scaling and its origin (Van Orden et al, 2005;Diniz et al, 2011), one position in the debate is that fractal scaling is a characteristic manifestation of self-organizing systems, which reflects the balance between independent and interdependent activity of their components. In this sense, deviations from perfect β = 1 pink noise would imply unbalancing this equilibrium in favour of either independent or interdependent activity, affecting the ability of a system to behave in a self-organized manner.…”
Section: Fractal Scaling and Self-organization In Complex Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scaling exponent is found to decrease with increased difficulty and an increased level of external perturbation of the response time task (cf. Diniz et al, 2011) and has been suggested to reflect the self-organization of cognitive processes (e.g., Van Orden et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%