2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Treatment of Intracranial Blood Blister Aneurysms – A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, the natural history of BBA is uncertain [ 26 ], and small sample sizes and substantial study heterogeneity make strong conclusions difficult [ 22 ], so the optimal timing of treatment for BBA is still uncertain. A study compared the impact of different surgical timings on patient prognosis, and the results showed that there was no significant difference between early surgery and delayed elective surgery [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the natural history of BBA is uncertain [ 26 ], and small sample sizes and substantial study heterogeneity make strong conclusions difficult [ 22 ], so the optimal timing of treatment for BBA is still uncertain. A study compared the impact of different surgical timings on patient prognosis, and the results showed that there was no significant difference between early surgery and delayed elective surgery [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the efficacy of microsurgical, interventional, and combined methods for BBAs have been demonstrated, no one-fit-all solution exists ( 10 16 ). Successful microsurgical treatment of BBA has been demonstrated, including clipping, wrap-clipping, suturing, and extracranial-intracranial bypass ( 4 , 17 ). Wrap-clipping, in comparison to wrapping and clipping, has been shown in several studies with low recurrence and re-rupture rates ( 18 , 19 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 23 , 29 ] Overall, endovascular treatment produces a higher percentage of favorable outcomes with modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0–2 when compared to microsurgical intervention due to lower perioperative morbidity and mortality. [ 17 , 22 , 24 ] The main disadvantage of endovascular treatment is a lower immediate occlusion rate. [ 23 , 28 ] Most lesions will require more than one stent to potentiate aneurysm occlusion and often require extended time to achieve occlusion, as long as 13.6 months.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%