Contending Approaches and Models for Rationalizing Chinese Public Organizations: The Case of Western China

Abstract

This paper reports our field study findings about the efforts of the Communist Party of China (CPC) to rationalize Chinese public organizations. Our focus here is on public organizations in western China. Classifying the development of China into the strategizing, politicizing, and pragmatizing eras, with each era having its unique historical events, reflecting CPC’s basic logic in organization and management and in turn affecting officials’ behavioral tendencies, we examine CPC’s basic political–rational approach and the different rationalization models used in different eras. The contending models had produced mix-results, as most officials are either politically submissive to higher authority, as in the case of western China or, as in eastern region, in transformation, becoming a self-serving hybrid with monopoly of both economic and political powers. Implications are discussed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007Bureaucracy, Cadre management, Political rationality, Instrumental rationality, Western China,

The Dynamics of Sustainable Regime Continuity of China

“…In brief, whereas CPC is in theory the vanguard of the proletariats, the rapid economic development in the past decades has resulted in the formation of bourgeoisie whose property rights are constitutionally protected since the 2004 constitutional amendment (Gallagher, 2005). Plentiful cases have documented that many Chinese capitalists are aggressive in promoting their self-interest through bribery, making "collusion between money and power" a hallmark of CPC governance, particularly at the local level (Chow & Luo, 2007). As a result, many law-abiding citizens are punished for being incorruptible, while immoral beings are rewarded for their wickedness.…”

Resuming an Unfinished Tale

“…Another proposal is to collect data on dominant logics through observing behavior. This approach infers implicitly held logics by observing similar behaviors to provide evidence that the logic precedes the behavior, for example, by interviews over a long period (Chow & Luo, 2007) or by retrospectively collecting observations of behavior (Côte, Langley, & Pasquero, 1999). A drawback of the observation approach is that while a pattern of repetitive behavior will become apparent, no understanding of the possible origins of the pattern is obtained.…”

Implementing asset management inside infrastructure agencies

“…This approach infers implicitly held logics by observing similar behaviors to provide evidence that the logic precedes the behavior, e.g. by interviews over a long period (Chow and Luo, 2007) or by retrospectively collecting observations of behavior (Côte, Langley, and Pasquero, 1999). A drawback of the observation approach is that while a pattern of repetitive behavior will become apparent, no understanding of the possible origins of the pattern is obtained.…”