2020
DOI: 10.29298/rmcf.v12i63.800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contenido de carbono y estructura horizontal de un bosque templado en Guadalupe y Calvo, Chihuahua

Abstract: Es importante conocer la estructura y la cantidad de carbono almacenado en los ecosistemas forestales, ya que representan uno de los principales sumideros de dióxido de carbono (CO2) en los ecosistemas terrestres. Este estudio se llevó acabo en el ejido Chinatú, municipio Guadalupe y Calvo, Chihuahua, donde se realizó un muestreo aleatorio de ocho sitios circulares de 1 000 m2 distribuidos en 80.46 ha de superficie. Se analizó la estructura horizontal con base en el Índice de Valor de Importancia (IVI) y clase… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting C capture value up to 14.82 Mg C ha −1 (Table 6), is low compared to values reported for other forests of northern Mexico: 26.87 Mg C ha −1 [57], 36.42 Mg C ha −1 [58], and 66.42 Mg C ha −1 [59] in Durango, and 37 Mg C ha −1 in Nuevo Leon [60]. In other forests of Chihuahua, C storage is reported as 45.20 Mg C ha −1 for a Pseudotsuga menziesii forest [61] and 46.71 Mg C ha −1 for a temperate mixed pine-oak forest [62], while CONAFOR [63] obtained 6.3 to 16.5 Mg C ha −1 and 16.5 to 28.2 Mg C ha −1 using algorithms.…”
Section: Capture and Structure By Altitudinal Gradientmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting C capture value up to 14.82 Mg C ha −1 (Table 6), is low compared to values reported for other forests of northern Mexico: 26.87 Mg C ha −1 [57], 36.42 Mg C ha −1 [58], and 66.42 Mg C ha −1 [59] in Durango, and 37 Mg C ha −1 in Nuevo Leon [60]. In other forests of Chihuahua, C storage is reported as 45.20 Mg C ha −1 for a Pseudotsuga menziesii forest [61] and 46.71 Mg C ha −1 for a temperate mixed pine-oak forest [62], while CONAFOR [63] obtained 6.3 to 16.5 Mg C ha −1 and 16.5 to 28.2 Mg C ha −1 using algorithms.…”
Section: Capture and Structure By Altitudinal Gradientmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The differences in C storage in the above studies may result from differences in the methodology followed, species and age of trees, as well as other factors such as climate and type of soil [64]. The results showed that the annual timber growth in the study area can be up to 1.49 m 3 ha −1 year −1 [17], whereas for the nearby forest of Guadalupe y Calvo Chihuahua values of up to 3 m 3 ha −1 year −1 were found [65], while Nuevo Leon reported an annual timber growth of 2 m 3 ha −1 year −1 [60]. The species richness and C storage values are likely higher, since neither individuals smaller than 7.5 cm in diameter nor the understory were considered in this study.…”
Section: Capture and Structure By Altitudinal Gradientmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…La pérdida y degradación de los hábitats donde estas especies tienden a desarrollarse puede aludirse principalmente a la fragmentación por actividades silvícolas impactando fuertemente en la diversidad de especies (Lindenmayer y Franklin, 2002;Valdés-Castillo, 2018). Es por lo que para establecer mejores estrategias de manejo sobre todo es especies vulnerables es necesario caracterizar la estructura horizontal y vertical de las masas arbóreas para entender mejor su comportamiento (Aguirre, 2015;García-García et. al., 2020).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified