2016
DOI: 10.1037/drm0000032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content analysis of Chinese dreams—Pleasure or pain?

Abstract: Unlike dream reports around the world, Chinese people's dreams seem to display more pleasant affect and content. In view of this cultural disparity, the present study examined whether the predominance of unpleasant dream content revealed by Western studies using the Dream Threat Scale and the Hall and Van de Castle (1966) coding system could be replicated in a sample of dreams reported by Chinese people. The sample consisted of 252 most recently recalled dreams and 228 diary dreams collected from 286 Chinese p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies were collections of dream information from individualistic societies. On the other hand, in a recent study using content analysis to study most recent dreams and dream diaries in a Chinese sample, Hsu and Yu (2016) showed that dreams were mostly negative rather than positive in nature. However, the frequency of threats that appeared in these dreams was low, and the threats were minor.…”
Section: Cultural Differences In Dreamingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These studies were collections of dream information from individualistic societies. On the other hand, in a recent study using content analysis to study most recent dreams and dream diaries in a Chinese sample, Hsu and Yu (2016) showed that dreams were mostly negative rather than positive in nature. However, the frequency of threats that appeared in these dreams was low, and the threats were minor.…”
Section: Cultural Differences In Dreamingmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Copious evidence lends support to the notion that dreams are mostly unpleasant regardless of culture or race (Domhoff, 1996; Hall & Van de Castle, 1966; Merritt et al, 1994; Nielsen et al, 1991; Valli et al, 2005, 2008). This notion still holds true even when adopting the classification systems that equalize the numbers of positive and negative categories for dream coding, such as supplementing the Hall and Van de Castle system (HVC; 1966) with Bulkeley’s (2006) Good Fortune Scale (Hsu & Yu, 2016). The unbalanced categories of positive and negative emotions, therefore, cannot explain the preponderance of dream unpleasantness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides negative emotions, all three dream scales have also been demonstrated to vary positively with cheerful emotions and magical ideation and negatively with repressiveness and the NEO-Five Factor Inventory Agreeableness (Yu, 2013a(Yu, , 2013b(Yu, , 2013c. Some evidence (Hsu & Yu, 2016;Yu, 2015) suggests that Chinese people's dreams display less emotional and sexual materials. The collectivist Chinese culture places higher value on composedness than very arousing and explicit emotions (Tsai & Levenson, 1997) and encourages the subordination of individual desires for the sake of group harmony (Markus & Kitayama, 1991).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dream content varies across times and cultures; nonetheless, some general characteristics of dream content that are shared by different cultures or signify a certain group of individuals have been identified. For instance, Hsu and Yu’s (2016) analysis of most recent and diary dream reports indicates that Chinese people’s dreams are, similar to those of people from other cultures, largely negative. Specifically, aggressive interaction, fearful affect, failure, and misfortune are more common than friendly interaction, joyful affect, success, and good fortune in dreams.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation