2008 International Conference on Technology and Applications in Biomedicine 2008
DOI: 10.1109/itab.2008.4570597
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content-based retrieval of compressed medical images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While humans can match similar images or objects, machine vision research is still away from similar performance for computers. Currently, many retrieval approaches are based on low-level features such as color, texture, and shape features, leaving a 'semantic gap' to the high-level understanding of users (Schaefer 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While humans can match similar images or objects, machine vision research is still away from similar performance for computers. Currently, many retrieval approaches are based on low-level features such as color, texture, and shape features, leaving a 'semantic gap' to the high-level understanding of users (Schaefer 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While CBIR feature extraction needs to be performed quickly, especially for large image datasets, this is hindered by relatively slow image decompression that needs to be employed before features can be extracted from the pixel domain. A faster approach is to perform this directly in the compressed domain, that is to perform compressed domain image retrieval (Mandal, Idris, & Panchanathan, 1999;Schaefer, 2010) and support so-called mid-stream content access (Picard, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%