Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax

Klyne, G.; McIntyre, L.

doi:10.17487/rfc2531

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Appendix A of this document repeats the descriptions of feature tags introduced by RFC 2531 [22], with some small revisions. These have been registered in the "IETF tree", according to the procedure described in section 3.1.1 of "Media Feature Tag Registration Procedure" [1] (i.e.…”

Section: Iana Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax (V2)

Klyne¹,

McIntyre²

2000

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Iana Considerationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax (V2)

Klyne¹,

McIntyre²

2000

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For example, it might be useful to describe that a PDA has different capabilities depending on whether it is being used in landscape or portrait mode. There are a number of IETF drafts and RFCs on MFS: for more details see [31], [32], [33], [34] and [36].…”

Section: Media Feature Setsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using capability profiles for appliance aggregation

Butler¹

Proceedings 3rd IEEE International Workshop on System-on-Chip for Real-Time Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

appliance aggregation, capability negotiation, device profile, delivery context This paper reviews how several existing standards try to address specific use cases for appliance aggregation. These standards all rely on devices being able to describe their capabilities to other devices. In order to do this, each standard defines its own idiosyncratic profile structure and profile vocabulary. Furthermore applications using this information often need to perform standard tasks such as selection, generation or adaptation based on this information. The problems of devising profile vocabularies, profile structures and matching and selection algorithms are already being explored in the Adaptable Web Delivery Project in HP Labs. This paper discusses the relevance of this work to appliance aggregation and highlights steps that can be taken to resolve the current proliferation of standards. Abstract-This paper reviews how several existing standards try to address specific use cases for appliance aggregation. These standards all rely on devices being able to describe their capabilities to other devices. In order to do this, each standard defines its own idiosyncratic profile structure and profile vocabulary. Furthermore applications using this information often need to perform standard tasks such as selection, generation or adaptation based on this information. The problems of devising profile vocabularies, profile structures and matching and selection algorithms are already being explored in the Adaptable Web Delivery Project in HP Labs. This paper discusses the relevance of this work to appliance aggregation and highlights steps that can be taken to resolve the current proliferation of standards.

show abstract

Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax

Cited by 2 publications

References 4 publications

Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax (V2)

Content Feature Schema for Internet Fax (V2)

Using capability profiles for appliance aggregation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About