Content Structure Development for Parent Education in Case of Children with Developmental Disabilities - Focusing on the ICF Model -

In, Jeon Hae; Young, Son Ji; Shim, Eunjung

doi:10.18541/ser.2020.08.19.3.147

Cited by 2 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among other newly observed research topics were the analysis of ICF items based on their concepts in the process of developing items for designing a new functioning measurement tool [28,29], and the application of the ICF framework to daily life guidelines and educational materials for the parents of children with disabilities [30][31][32]. These new research topics imply that the ICF, a biopsychosocial model, has been applied to the development of tools for various purposes.…”

Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the area of special education, some studies were conducted by reflecting the characteristics of disabilities found in various age groups from infants to college students [15,36,38]. There were also studies carried out on parents for information collection and education related to functioning [31,39]. As for studies on the elderly, studies for evaluation using previously collected elderly survey data and for predictive model development were identified [40,41].…”

Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Review of Domestic Research Trends Related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): 2015-2020

Song

2021

KSPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

METHODS: Precedent studies were searched with the search term "ICF" or "international classification of functioning, disability and health" from the databases of RISS, KISS, DBpia, and Pubmed. The inclusion criteria are that the studies have been carried out in Korea from 2015 to 2020 using ICF by researchers consisting of one or more Koreans and have been peer-reviewed. RESULTS:Of the total 269 studies, 107 that met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. It was found that these studies were published at a similar frequency each year. The most common area of expertise was identified as the clinical area (n = 67), followed by special education (n = 21) and social welfare (n = 13). The study subject groups were mostly patients (n = 39), disabled people (n = 25), and related experts (n = 13). The most common research topic was functioning †Corresponding Author : Ju-Min Song

show abstract

Section: ⅳ Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%