2008
DOI: 10.1093/sp/jxn020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contentious Citizenship: Policies and Debates on the Veil in the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…One important side note to this conclusion is that our results depend on the particular issue we used in this study: the integration of Dutch non-Western immigrant women into the labor market. For instance, the Dutch debate on immigrant women centers around arguments of emancipation (the question of whether immigrant women should "act like" Dutch women; see Saharso & Lettinga, 2008). However, we must note that the results of any study using one issue only will be determined by this choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One important side note to this conclusion is that our results depend on the particular issue we used in this study: the integration of Dutch non-Western immigrant women into the labor market. For instance, the Dutch debate on immigrant women centers around arguments of emancipation (the question of whether immigrant women should "act like" Dutch women; see Saharso & Lettinga, 2008). However, we must note that the results of any study using one issue only will be determined by this choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar overlapping can be diagnosed between the segregationist and the accommodative models of secularism: the Dutch national model of citizenship, at least during its phase of pillarization, has been described as strongly favoring multicultural settings. (Saharso and Lettinga 2008) The second comment has to do with the comparative evaluation of the three models.…”
Section: Varieties Of Secular Formations: Coercive Segregationimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Her fi ndes dog tøjregulativer for off entlige ansatte i politiet, i ministerier og for dommere, som begraenser den enkeltes ret til at udtrykke sin religion, og parlamentet vedtog i 2007 et generelt forbud mod fuld tildaekning af ansigtet med henvisning til den off entlige sikkerhed. Alligevel peger hollandske forskere på, at muslimske minoriteter stadig med succes kan henvise til den staerke tradition for reli-gionsfrihed som en støtte i deres kamp for at få ret til at baere hijab (Saharso & Lettinga, 2008).…”
Section: Debatter Og Regulering Af Muslimske Tørklaeder I Europaunclassified
“…I Folketingsdebatten og burka-debatten tolkes tørklaedet som symbol monolitisk, idet det udelukkende italesaettes som kvindeundertrykkende. Forskningen har vist, at tørklaeder og slør er multifacetteret (Laborde, 2006;Saharso & Lettinga 2008), men den mangfoldighed, som tørklaeder repraesenterer, kommer ikke til udtryk i de ovennaevnte to debatter. En vaesentlig årsag til den monolitiske symbollaesning af tørklaeder er, at de tørklaedebaerende kvinder ikke har stemme i debatterne.…”
Section: Folketingsdebatten Om Forbud Mod Hijab I Off Entlige Instituunclassified