2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conterminous United States demonstration and characterization of MODIS-based Landsat ETM+ atmospheric correction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impact of the atmospheric correction is most apparent comparing the true color TOA reflectance (a) and surface reflectance (b). The atmospheric correction increases the true color image spatial contrast and reduces the blue appearance, which is expected from comparable Landsat atmospheric correction experiments [64,65]. The distinct smoke plume is not well corrected, which as noted earlier is a problem for most atmospheric correction methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impact of the atmospheric correction is most apparent comparing the true color TOA reflectance (a) and surface reflectance (b). The atmospheric correction increases the true color image spatial contrast and reduces the blue appearance, which is expected from comparable Landsat atmospheric correction experiments [64,65]. The distinct smoke plume is not well corrected, which as noted earlier is a problem for most atmospheric correction methods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The distinct smoke plume is not well corrected, which as noted earlier is a problem for most atmospheric correction methods. The impact of the atmospheric correction is visually less apparent in the longer wavelength false color bands, i.e., comparing (c) and (d), which is expected as atmospheric effects are smaller at longer wavelengths [65,66]. The false color longer wavelength bands are more sensitive to the effects of fire on vegetation and consequently the extensive burned area in the east side of the image has more contrast with the surrounding unburned vegetation than is apparent in the true color images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, the same pattern of the Q2 n values considering just the red, green, and blue bands (Table 3) and considering all six spectral bands (Table 4) was found. Perhaps this reflects the reduced atmospheric scattering that occurs at longer wavelengths [57,58]. The results of this study indicate that the LPAD approach can be applied to downscale all of the Landsat-8 30-m OLI bands.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Specifically, atmospheric and perhaps surface differences (due to biomass burning) between the Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2A images meant that differences between the downscaled Landsat-8 20 m and Sentinel-2A 20 m were not due only to the downscaling. The Sentinel-2A image was acquired a day after the Landsat-8 image and contained spatially extensive aerosols that are known to scatter and absorb radiation and that effectively reduce the image contrast [57,58]. Atmospheric correction methodologies that use radiative transfer algorithms and atmospheric characterization data are most suitable for large area and/or repeat atmospheric correction [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The various methods of identifying and removal of such artefacts are referred to as atmospheric correction, and involve extensive use of external reference data sources, such as sun photometers (Vermote et al 1995;Fedosejevs et al 2000), operational atmospheric radiance models (Trishchenko et al 2002) and weather simulation models (Vermote et al 2002). Thus far operational atmospheric correction methods which use data provided by the sensor itself have only been presented for the MODIS sensor, which offers high short-wave infrared resolution (Wang, Shi 2007;Okin, Gu 2015;Roy et al 2014). This being said, the process of removing atmospheric artefacts from an image is a complex one, and even the availability of reliable reference data does not guarantee successful correction of the image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%