2018
DOI: 10.1093/lril/lry018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contested international agreements, contested national politics: how the radical left and the radical right opposed TTIP in four European countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has become common to note that social movements during the anti-austerity wave mainly addressed national targets – after the Global Justice Movement’s unsuccessful attempts to target EU politics in the early 2000s (Flesher Fominaya, 2017; Kaldor and Selchow, 2013). Similarly, Rone (2018) shows how recent protest against TTIP was shaped by distinct national debates. Therefore, the Europeanization of social movements is not a linear process, but, as in the case of Stop Vivisection, can be reverted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has become common to note that social movements during the anti-austerity wave mainly addressed national targets – after the Global Justice Movement’s unsuccessful attempts to target EU politics in the early 2000s (Flesher Fominaya, 2017; Kaldor and Selchow, 2013). Similarly, Rone (2018) shows how recent protest against TTIP was shaped by distinct national debates. Therefore, the Europeanization of social movements is not a linear process, but, as in the case of Stop Vivisection, can be reverted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Garcia‐Duran et al (2020) have shown how the European Commission, in its communication, has sought to contain bottom‐up politicisation by both emphasising the role of the EU in managing globalisation and by directly countering populist narratives (See also Eliasson and Garcia‐Duran, this Special Issue). Others have highlighted how the mobilisation of civil society actors and the political opportunity structures available to them (Gheyle, 2020), as well as the behaviour of political parties (Rone, 2018), are crucial drivers of politicisation.…”
Section: Understanding the Politicisation Of Eu Trade Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the party 'shall give due consideration to the views of the Committee, together with its recommendations' and 'shall submit to the Committee, within six months, a written response'. 171 As noted in Section 6.5.2.1, these dual obligations are enunciated for the CESCR and the CRC as well. 172 Overall, the reasoning of the Spanish highest 166 Kanetake, 'UN Human Rights Treaty Monitoring Bodies before Domestic Courts', 205-6.…”
Section: Normative Pathway: An Obligation To Complymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in Europe, citizens, environmental activists and other political actors have used contestatory mechanisms to distance investment treaties from their domestic legal orders. Protests and claims of political parties and NGOs against the intrusion of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), CETA and the ISDS norm into the European legal order and the constitutional order of EU member states have been one manifestation of this practice of resistance 171. In this context, European institutions and courts, too, have become important actors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%