2016
DOI: 10.3102/0002831216658972
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contesting the Public School

Abstract: Although technically open to all, charter schools often emphasize distinctive missions that appeal to particular groups of students and families. These missions, especially ones focusing on ethnic, linguistic, and cultural differences, also contribute to segregation between schools. Such schools raise normative questions about the aims of education. Are they a troubling retreat from an integrated public school system? Or are they new public spaces relevant to the needs of certain communities? Through a case st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, HOTCS leadership took advantage of its autonomy and organized responses without needing to confer with leadership of the traditional school system. Charter schools often create their own organizational culture in order to distinguish them from the traditional public schools ( Wilson, 2016), and we see how HOTCS was able to leverage its strong school-community relationships in order to increase student attendance. Research highlights the growing digital divide evident in charter schools (Barrett & Gerstenfeld, 2020) and findings from this study suggest HOTCS leadership made a concerted effort to increase technology access and use, especially as tools to reduce absenteeism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, HOTCS leadership took advantage of its autonomy and organized responses without needing to confer with leadership of the traditional school system. Charter schools often create their own organizational culture in order to distinguish them from the traditional public schools ( Wilson, 2016), and we see how HOTCS was able to leverage its strong school-community relationships in order to increase student attendance. Research highlights the growing digital divide evident in charter schools (Barrett & Gerstenfeld, 2020) and findings from this study suggest HOTCS leadership made a concerted effort to increase technology access and use, especially as tools to reduce absenteeism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Further, there are broader questions about the role of charter school policy in the movement toward racial equity in schools. For some, charters provide opportunities for racially minoritized students (Wilson, 2016). However, others raise concerns about to whom charter schools are accountable (Scott, 2009(Scott, , 2013Frankenberg et al, 2010;Buras, 2011;Chapman & Antrop-González, 2011).…”
Section: Policy and Practice Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to market tenets, some charters are informed by the progressive goals of advancing equitable opportunity and access for poor communities and communities of color long underserved by the traditional public school system. Communities leveraged the flexibility and autonomy afforded by the charter model to create ethnocentric charter schools (Fox & Buchanan, 2014;Wilson, 2016) and charters serving the educational needs of poor or immigrant families or those speaking languages other than English (Rofes & Stulberg, 2004). Moreover, for their progressive advocates, charters were intended to animate local participatory democracy, enabling teachers, families, and other stakeholders to create schools that reflected local needs and preferences (Budde, 1988).…”
Section: Network Of Progressive Charter Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%