2013
DOI: 10.1080/14724049.2012.737796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contesting the zoo as a setting for ecotourism, and the design of a first principle

Abstract: This article uses animal ethics theory to address the issue of whether zoos are a morally acceptable form of ecotourism. Arguments in favour of the zoo as ecotourism have justified this stance according to education and conservation factors. However, a survey of literature on zoos points to the fact that they are not as effective in the area of conservation as they contend, nor do they educate visitors at a level that would be deemed meaningful and long-lasting. In the absence of success in these areas, it is … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the potential of zoos to aid conservation through education is a contentious issue. Some scholars argue that it is not possible (Conway, 2003;Davey, 2007;Fennell, 2013;Spedding, 2000) while equally strong support has been presented for the opposing position (Catibog-Sinha, 2008;Falk et al, 2007;Perdue, Stoinski, & Maple, 2012;Smith & Broad, 2008). This paper is not focused on attempting to discuss these opposing views or their validity instead readers are invited to read the article by Carr and Cohen (2011) for an introduction to the debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…However, the potential of zoos to aid conservation through education is a contentious issue. Some scholars argue that it is not possible (Conway, 2003;Davey, 2007;Fennell, 2013;Spedding, 2000) while equally strong support has been presented for the opposing position (Catibog-Sinha, 2008;Falk et al, 2007;Perdue, Stoinski, & Maple, 2012;Smith & Broad, 2008). This paper is not focused on attempting to discuss these opposing views or their validity instead readers are invited to read the article by Carr and Cohen (2011) for an introduction to the debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The conservation messages that were advocated in zoos were subtle and short-term (i.e., onsite actions) and overall there were missed opportunities to advocate visitor conservation actions at home [e.g., Broad and Weiler, 1998]. While there have been some studies in the decade since that quantify the impact of a zoo visit on conservation behavior [e.g., Smith et al, 2008;Kemmerly and Macfarlane, 2009;Clayton et al, 2013;Pearson et al, 2014] progress has not been proportional to the educational claims of zoos [Fennell, 2013] and greater research and advancement is needed in this area [Mason, 2000;Fraser and Wharton, 2007;Hughes, 2013].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps experiencing a variety of encounters encourages re-evaluation of one's position in the web of life and offers different perspectives as we have discussed elsewhere (Yerbury & Weiler, 2020). Captive experiences are considered human-centered (Fennell, 2013a), entertainment-focused (Packer & Ballantyne, 2012), and promoting of utilitarian ideas (Curtin & Wilkes, 2007). Thus, we expected encounters with captive marine mammals to be more closely linked with anthropocentric beliefs than with ecocentric beliefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%