2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3105278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context‐Aware Cloud Service Selection Model for Mobile Cloud Computing Environments

Abstract: Mobile cloud computing (MCC) has attracted extensive attention in recent years. With the prevalence of MCC, how to select trustworthy and high quality mobile cloud services becomes one of the most urgent problems. Therefore, this paper focuses on the trustworthy service selection and recommendation in mobile cloud computing environments. We propose a novel service selection and recommendation model (SSRM), where user similarity is calculated based on user context information and interest. In addition, the rela… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After working for a period of time, the network can reach a relatively stable state. Compared with feedforward neural network, it has higher complexity [17,18]. (1) Gaussian function (Gaussian function)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After working for a period of time, the network can reach a relatively stable state. Compared with feedforward neural network, it has higher complexity [17,18]. (1) Gaussian function (Gaussian function)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fog cloud environment, QoS information is normally collected and stored in various fog servers, instead of being transferred to the remote cloud directly, due to the big volume of data and heavy transmission cost. In this situation, QoS information is always distributed but not centralized [9], which means QoS information is often sparse and unavailable for mobile users. Therefore, motivated by making an effective recommendation, it is a feasible way to complete missing QoS values by making predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%