2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35395-6_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-Aware Generation and Adaptive Execution of Daily Living Care Pathways

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given context information, the most common approach taken by studies, such as [1], [9], [10], [11], [12], is to invoke a planning algorithm by an explicit user request, and to plan without considering the possibilities to reduce power consumption. For example, Kaldeli et al [1] encode the planning problem as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) in which the problem description contains context information and a declarative goal issued either by a user or by a rulebased engine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given context information, the most common approach taken by studies, such as [1], [9], [10], [11], [12], is to invoke a planning algorithm by an explicit user request, and to plan without considering the possibilities to reduce power consumption. For example, Kaldeli et al [1] encode the planning problem as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) in which the problem description contains context information and a declarative goal issued either by a user or by a rulebased engine.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preferences. A user may select and customise recipes [Kotsovinos and Vukovic 2005], indicate personalised choices on various devices [Ding et al 2006;Fraile et al 2013], and provide preferences on services [Liang et al 2010;Song and Lee 2013;Chen et al 2014], daily activities [Mastrogiovanni et al 2010;Vaquero et al 2015;Köckemann et al 2014], domains Yau and Buduru 2014], treatments [S ánchez-Garzón et al 2012], timetables ], companion systems [Honold et al 2014], and products ]. In Ranganathan and Campbell [2004], user preferences are in the form of utility u for each predicate in different contexts, where u ∈ [−10, 10].…”
Section: Review Of Primary Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human Actions. Human actions are primary entities in the domain of assisted living for implementing applications for care giving [Courtemanche et al 2008;Hidalgo et al 2011;S ánchez-Garzón et al 2012], cooking [Kotsovinos and Vukovic 2005;Sando and Hishiyama 2011;Ortiz et al 2013], shopping , training [Bacon et al 2013], and system assembling [Honold et al 2014]. It is practically difficult to extract a generalisation of human actions because of the diversity of adopted models and the lack of representation details (for examples of human actions encoded in PDDL, we refer to Appendix B.2).…”
Section: Review Of Primary Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, reasoning in (Viterbo and Endler, 2012) is distributed in that different computational nodes cooperate to infer a global context state; the reasoning process is however limited to ontology-based inference, and is not resilient to inaccurate or conflicting information. Finally, all existing knowledge-based reasoning approaches assume a single direction information flow: from sensor input, through to data analysis and decision-making, and then to reaction and control, irrespective of the extent to which each of these phases are decentralised (Snchez-Garzn et al, 2012;Valero et al, 2013). …”
Section: Research Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%