Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing 2008
DOI: 10.1145/1363686.1364243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-aware information retrieval on a ubiquitous medical learning environment

Abstract: This paper proposes an information retrieval process that employs a relevance feedback approach based on implicit evidences provided by contextual information and explicit evidences provided by the user behavior during interaction. This process takes advantage of semantic information processing enabled by the use of ontologies to build semantic indexes, to represent context and domain knowledge and to aid interactions mediated by mobile devices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past several years, tremendous efforts have been made to develop context‐aware systems for health professionals, but disproportionally less attention has been paid to consumer‐oriented systems (Lopes & Ribeiro, ). The existing systems focusing on consumers rely mainly on three sources for contextualization: explicit feedback from users' interactions with a system, such as browsing results (Martins, Santana, Biajiz, do Prado, & de Souza, ), individuals' interests or personal health information (Luo & Tang, ), and medical thesauri, such as UMLS and MeSH (Zeng et al., ). The contextualization often takes place in two IR processes: indexing, and query operation and recommendation (Lopes & Ribeiro, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past several years, tremendous efforts have been made to develop context‐aware systems for health professionals, but disproportionally less attention has been paid to consumer‐oriented systems (Lopes & Ribeiro, ). The existing systems focusing on consumers rely mainly on three sources for contextualization: explicit feedback from users' interactions with a system, such as browsing results (Martins, Santana, Biajiz, do Prado, & de Souza, ), individuals' interests or personal health information (Luo & Tang, ), and medical thesauri, such as UMLS and MeSH (Zeng et al., ). The contextualization often takes place in two IR processes: indexing, and query operation and recommendation (Lopes & Ribeiro, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This integrates subject-keywords with domain-keywords to provide greater performance, but the specific sense in WordNet has to be chosen by the user. Martins et al (2008) used a domain-specific ontology for information retrieval on a ubiquitous medical learning environment. They employed an implicit relevance feedback approach using contextual information to build semantic indexes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [15], we refer to context as any information that can be used to characterise the situation of an entity, where an entity is a person, a place, or an object that is considered as relevant for the interaction between a user and an application. Context-awareness is a very common tool in medical information systems especially when combined with IR techniques: [22] enriches a standard IR engine for medical documents with the UMLS ontology 1 and a context model. The ontology is used as a reference index; the terms in the documents are linked to the resources of the ontology to increase the recall of the retrieval process, while the context-model is used to annotate the documents with meta-data about the context of the document's author.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this system, the original query is forwarded to Google and the contextual data are used to further filter and rank the search results. In both [22] and [28], the context meta-data are biased toward either the document author's or the patient's perspective and they fail to represent other contexts of fruition of the information (e.g., the situation or the device capabilities). SAFE uses the information stored in the SAFE Card in a similar way, however its context-model, based on the one presented in [10], is much more expressive than those adopted in the previous two systems and can model all the necessary perspectives (i.e., situations) involving users, systems and applications.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%