2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3075385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-Aware Software Vulnerability Classification Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When comparing the experiment results between Table 5 and Table 3, our proposed method was more effective than other approaches. Specifically, Russell's approach [8] was inferior to ours on all measurements. Especially with the recall score, this method was lower than our proposed method by more than 60%.…”
Section: Experiments Results Of Scenariomentioning
confidence: 59%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When comparing the experiment results between Table 5 and Table 3, our proposed method was more effective than other approaches. Specifically, Russell's approach [8] was inferior to ours on all measurements. Especially with the recall score, this method was lower than our proposed method by more than 60%.…”
Section: Experiments Results Of Scenariomentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In this paper, we reuse the experiment results presented in the study [34]. Specifically, the approaches compared and evaluated with our method include: REVEAL [34], Russell [8], VulDeePecker [11], SySeVR [31], and Devign [46]. Table 5 below lists the experiment results of other approaches on the Verum dataset.…”
Section: Experiments Results Of Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As presented above, for the problem of source code vulnerability detection, the two most critical factors determining the accuracy of the classification process are feature extraction and classification processes. However, based on our observations, recent approaches have not effectively addressed both these issues, leading to limited experimental results [8,9]. Specifically, as follows:…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 94%