2019 10th International Conference on Dependable Systems, Services and Technologies (DESSERT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/dessert.2019.8770048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-aware Systems Testing and Validation

Abstract: Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author's name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pagination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approaches based on user reviews (Atoum 2020;Jiang et al 2019;Leopairote et al 2013;Qian et al 2016) have the potential for generalization, but the adaptation process is not analyzed nor described. Also, (Augusto et al 2019) describes a generalizable approach, but it is oriented to test context aspects (of CASSs) specifically. iii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The approaches based on user reviews (Atoum 2020;Jiang et al 2019;Leopairote et al 2013;Qian et al 2016) have the potential for generalization, but the adaptation process is not analyzed nor described. Also, (Augusto et al 2019) describes a generalizable approach, but it is oriented to test context aspects (of CASSs) specifically. iii.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study considers three elements to represent the context (user profile, physical environment, platform) and quantifies metrics for the characteristics of SQuaRE in each context. Augusto et al (2019) describe a methodological approach to consider the context to derive the scenarios in which the system should be tested. The techniques that have been applied for context modeling include UML activity diagrams (Mirza and Khan 2018), formal methods (Djoudi et al 2016), based on bi-graphical reactive systems (Cherfia et al 2017) and context-aware flow graphs (Lu et al 2006).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, each element was subjected to basic software testing processes focusing more on reliability than, for example, performance, although that was taken into consideration. Also, as the work by Augusto et al points out [47], there are gaps in context testing in intelligent environments. The context is outside classical development testing, yet it is a crucial element of these sorts of systems.…”
Section: Wandering Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research various contexts for each ADL or behaviour and some action related to them (e.g. going out) were tested following the methodology proposed in [47]. Some AR assessment examples can be seen at the Figshare repository 6 .…”
Section: Wandering Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Sect. 5, the system is tested as a whole using Context-aware systems testing validation (COATI) [14] approach to gather insights from the different users. The purpose of this step is to identify potential issues and benefits that may not be evident when the entire system is tested by different users.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%