2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-34974-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-Driven Corpus-Based Model for Automatic Text Segmentation and Part of Speech Tagging in Setswana Using OpenNLP Tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LiveLanguage and the UKC integrate both existing third-party resources and linguistic data collected through collaborations with universities. Examples of such collaborations include Mongolia (Batsuren et al, 2019), Scotland (Bella et al, 2020), India (Chandran Nair et al, 2022, Palestine (Khalilia et al, 2023), and South Africa (Dibitso et al, 2019). Striving to ensure that such collaborations are beneficial to local speaker communities and to avoid exploitative practices, LiveLanguage collaborations adopt a methodology based on co-creation and local empowerment, with the following characteristics: (a) representatives of local communities are leading the formulation of problems and needs, as well as the subsequent specifications of the language resources to be developed; (b) tools, infrastructure, and know-how are provided to local communities if needed, in order to embed solutions sustainably; (c) intellectual property rights stay with the local community; (d) language resources are integrated into the global LiveLanguage ecosystem, giving worldwide visibility to the results through the UKC database and the LiveLanguage data catalog.…”
Section: Addressing Epistemic Injustice In Language Technology: the L...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiveLanguage and the UKC integrate both existing third-party resources and linguistic data collected through collaborations with universities. Examples of such collaborations include Mongolia (Batsuren et al, 2019), Scotland (Bella et al, 2020), India (Chandran Nair et al, 2022, Palestine (Khalilia et al, 2023), and South Africa (Dibitso et al, 2019). Striving to ensure that such collaborations are beneficial to local speaker communities and to avoid exploitative practices, LiveLanguage collaborations adopt a methodology based on co-creation and local empowerment, with the following characteristics: (a) representatives of local communities are leading the formulation of problems and needs, as well as the subsequent specifications of the language resources to be developed; (b) tools, infrastructure, and know-how are provided to local communities if needed, in order to embed solutions sustainably; (c) intellectual property rights stay with the local community; (d) language resources are integrated into the global LiveLanguage ecosystem, giving worldwide visibility to the results through the UKC database and the LiveLanguage data catalog.…”
Section: Addressing Epistemic Injustice In Language Technology: the L...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an agglutinative language where some words can be formed by adding suffixes and prefixes to the root word. (Dibitso et al,2019). As with any other language, the main problem of Setswana PoS tagging is the ambiguities that may appear at different levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%