Context Effects in Cognitive Effort Evaluation

Abstract

When given a choice, people will avoid cognitively effortful courses of action because the experience of effort is evaluated as aversive and costly. At the same time, the subjective values of goods, actions, and experiences often depend on context in which they are evaluated. To probe the extent to which evaluation of cognitive effort is also context-dependent, we had participants learn associations between unique stimuli and subjective demand levels across low-demand and high-demand contexts and probed their subsequent preferences subjective ratings for these stimuli. We examined demand preferences using a forced-choice paradigm as well subjective effort ratings, taken both online and offline, across the low-demand and high-demand contexts. When choosing between two stimuli objectively identical in terms of demand, participants showed a clear preference for the stimulus learned in the low- versus high-demand context, and rated this stimulus as more subjectively effortful than the low-demand context in on-line, but not off-line ratings, suggesting an assimilation effect. Finally, we observed that the extent to which individual participants who exhibited stronger assimilation effects in off-line demand ratings were more likely to manifest an assimilation effect in demand preferences. Broadly, our findings suggest that effort evaluations occur in a context-dependent manner and are specifically assimilated to the broader context in which they occur.