“…With no information about the 3 short vowels and the null vowelization, there are, in principle, many possible phonological renderings, including the above example mustaqbal (“future”), as well as mastuqbal, mistuqbil, musataqbul, mustaqbil , and so on. While the first three examples are nonlexical, the last one ( mustaqbil ) is lexical, and means “host.” The ɣayr-maʃku:l MSTQBL مستقبل illustrates the two major challenges that children face in reading the opaque script: (a) identifying the word encoded in the written string, and (b) resolving the homographic word, a single letter string that has multiple phonological possibilities, each of which is associated with a different meaning (Bar-On, Dattner, & Ravid, 2017; Perfetti & Hart, 2001). Homography, which is omnipresent in both Arabic (Saiegh-Haddad & Hentkin-Roitfarb, 2014) and Hebrew (Shimron & Sivan, 1994), is beyond the scope of the current study, which focuses on word identification.…”