2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-016-9685-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context effects on heterophonic-homography resolution in learning to read hebrew

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that morpho-orthographic identification skills are not sufficient for reading ɣayr-maʃku:l texts. The high prevalence of homographic words in every Arabic text requires efficient reliance on context, as well as monitoring abilities (Bar-On et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that morpho-orthographic identification skills are not sufficient for reading ɣayr-maʃku:l texts. The high prevalence of homographic words in every Arabic text requires efficient reliance on context, as well as monitoring abilities (Bar-On et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With no information about the 3 short vowels and the null vowelization, there are, in principle, many possible phonological renderings, including the above example mustaqbal (“future”), as well as mastuqbal, mistuqbil, musataqbul, mustaqbil , and so on. While the first three examples are nonlexical, the last one ( mustaqbil ) is lexical, and means “host.” The ɣayr-maʃku:l MSTQBL مستقبل illustrates the two major challenges that children face in reading the opaque script: (a) identifying the word encoded in the written string, and (b) resolving the homographic word, a single letter string that has multiple phonological possibilities, each of which is associated with a different meaning (Bar-On, Dattner, & Ravid, 2017; Perfetti & Hart, 2001). Homography, which is omnipresent in both Arabic (Saiegh-Haddad & Hentkin-Roitfarb, 2014) and Hebrew (Shimron & Sivan, 1994), is beyond the scope of the current study, which focuses on word identification.…”
Section: Representation Of Phonology and Morphology In The Arabic Ortmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GP phenomenon sheds light on the various processes involved in evoking interpretation, such as the cumulative effect of context and monitoring and reanalysis processes. Using GP sentences, Bar-On et al (2017) examined voiced reading of Hebrew ht-homographic words in novice readers (2 nd to 4 th graders), more proficient readers (7 th graders), and fully skilled readers (11 th graders and adults). Though all groups showed significantly lower accuracy in deciphering the homographic word in GP sentences than non-GP sentences, accurate deciphering in GP sentences increased in relation to reading proficiency, with novice readers reaching 20%, more proficient readers peaking at 30%, 11 th graders reaching close to 40%, and adults reaching over 50% accuracy.…”
Section: Lexical Ambiguity Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high frequency of such words in Hebrew texts requires readers to lean on context for accurate interpretation (Share & Bar-On, 2018). Research in this area has most often addressed the words preceding an ambiguous word, which are known to affect ambiguity resolution (Bar-On, Ravid, & Dattner, 2017). However, the words succeeding an ambiguous word are likely to play a role in its resolution as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the above example – MŠQPT (תפקשמ) – represents not only miškèfet (binocular) but also mešakèfet (she reflects). The high level of lexical ambiguity of unpointed Hebrew text requires heavy reliance on the sentential context [59]. However, the role of context in reading Hebrew is beyond the scope of the current study, which aims to explore the use of phonological and morphological information in single-word reading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%