2003
DOI: 10.1353/sof.2003.0099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context Matters: Effects of the Proportion of Fundamentalists on Gender Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
127
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship between view of the Bible and traditional marital surnames is significant and strong, even when controlling for other influences. Our findings in this regard are a logical extension of previous research that shows literal views of the Bible associated with more traditional views of gender [25,43,44] and more traditional attitudes toward marital name-change [11]. Our findings on Biblical literalism are important for another reason.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The relationship between view of the Bible and traditional marital surnames is significant and strong, even when controlling for other influences. Our findings in this regard are a logical extension of previous research that shows literal views of the Bible associated with more traditional views of gender [25,43,44] and more traditional attitudes toward marital name-change [11]. Our findings on Biblical literalism are important for another reason.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…State-level research in the United States has shown that the more religious fundamentalism in a state, the more conservative the individual gender attitudes of people who live in that state, even apart from the individual's own religiosity (Moore and Vanneman 2003). Similarly, cross-national research on welfare attitudes has shown that the religious composition of a country can influence individual attitudes (VanHeuvelen 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that the religious context-measured through religious affiliation, belief, or behaviorof an area or state is significantly associated with a host of outcomes. The degree to which an area contains a greater proportion of particular religious traditions can influence cohabitation rates (Gault-Sherman & Draper, 2012), crime (Beyerlein & Hipp, 2005), gender attitudes (Moore & Vanneman, 2003), same-sex policy outcomes (Scheitle & Hahn, 2011), and population health (Blanchard et al, 2008). Strayhorn and Strayhorn (2009) (Kingston & Malamuth, 2011;Robinson, 1950;Schuessler, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%