2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context matters to explain field experiments: Results from Colombian and Thai fishing villages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
48
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
48
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of their results are also reported in Castillo et al (2011). 3 It is also neglected that not all studies using simple experiments have high external validity (Voors, 2012) especially without interpreting the data within the context of local norms and traditions (Tracer (2003) or Vollan (2012)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Some of their results are also reported in Castillo et al (2011). 3 It is also neglected that not all studies using simple experiments have high external validity (Voors, 2012) especially without interpreting the data within the context of local norms and traditions (Tracer (2003) or Vollan (2012)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Castillo et al (2011) found that age has a negative and significant relationship in the baseline condition (open access) and under different institutions such as a rotation system and an elected quota.…”
Section: Related Literaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janssen (2010) and Janssen et al (2010), for example, find that spatial resource dynamics can have a significant influence on the institutional rules that arise and that this element of complexity amplifies the importance of communication between resource users. Cardenas et al (2013), Castillo et al (2011) and Prediger et al (2011) also introduce spatial variability. In their designs, field subjects choose where to harvest (two options) and the location with too high harvest pressure will degrade temporarily.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%