Context-sensitive reconfiguration of collaborative manufacturing systems

Caesar, Birte; Nieke, Michael; Köcher, Aljosha; Hildebrandt, Constantin; Seidl, Christoph; Fay, Alexander; Schaefer, Ina

doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.11.194

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…APPENDIX A RESULTS OF THE SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW [58] 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [59] 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 [60] 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 [61] 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 [62] 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 [63] 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 [64] 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 [65] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 [66] 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 [67] 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [68] 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 [69] 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 [70] 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 [71] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 [72] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 [73] 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 [74] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 [75] 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 [39] 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 [76] 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 [77] 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 [78] 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 [79] 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 [80] 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 [81] 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 [82] 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 [83] 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 [84] 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 [85] 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 [86] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 [87] 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 [88] 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 [89] 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 [90] 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 [91] 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 [92] 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 [93] 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 [94] 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 [95] 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 …”

Section: Continued On Next Pagementioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Twin Framework for Reconfiguration Management: Concept & Evaluation

Caesar,

Barton,

Tilbury

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To remain competitive in a highly dynamic environment, manufacturing companies have to quickly react to disturbances or changing customer requirements. To enable manufacturing systems to cover these dynamics, the concept of reconfigurable manufacturing systems was introduced. From a technical point of view, this concept has been exploited for the past 20 years, revealing several different design solutions. However, industrial application is still an exception. Our analysis led to the assumption that this is due to a lack of operator support for reconfiguration management. In addition, mostly individual aspects of reconfiguration are considered instead of exploiting the entire reconfiguration space at the system and machine level. Therefore, in this paper, we present a digital twin framework for reconfiguration management considering reconfiguration as a holistic problem. We evaluate the framework by conducting a case study and challenging it by evaluating the completeness based on a systematic literature review, and analyze if it follows good practice based on 32 requirements for digital twin frameworks.

show abstract

Section: Continued On Next Pagementioning

confidence: 99%

Digital Twin Framework for Reconfiguration Management: Concept & Evaluation

Caesar,

Barton,

Tilbury

et al. 2023

IEEE Access

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The purpose of capability delivery adjustments is to change capability delivery as a response to the changing context and delivery performance without the need to redesign the capability and underlying IS [14]. Another study concerning manufacturing systems also emphasized the importance of dynamic reconfiguration of capabilities on run-time [15].…”

Section: Background and Related Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

An analysis of capability meta-models for expressing dynamic business transformation

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Environmental dynamism is gaining ground as a driving force for enterprise transformation. To address the changes, the capabilities of digital enterprises need to adapt. Capability modeling can facilitate this process of transformation. However, a plethora of approaches for capability modeling exist. This study explores how concepts relevant to change have been implemented in the meta-models of these approaches, aiming to visualize relationships among change-related concepts, and identify ways to improve capability modeling toward a more efficient depiction of capability change. The concepts are visualized in concept maps, and a framework is developed to assist the classification of concepts relevant to change functions. Similarities and differences among the existing models are discussed, leading to suggestions toward improvements of capability modeling for capability adaptation.

show abstract

“…Interdisciplinary product lines [23] aim to model the variability of CPPS resources, maintaining a domain-specific view on the modeled variability, but do not consider products and resources. Caesar et al [7] aim at a context-aware re-configuration of CPPSs using VM and semantic approaches. They model the variability of the CPPSs and their context in separate feature models linked through cross-tree constraints.…”

Section: Variability Modelingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A CPPS can interact with its environment, make context-aware decisions, and self-adapt to uncertain conditions [19,32], supporting the envisioned flexibility. Recent research shows growing interest in applying SPL engineering concepts to CPPS engineering [1,7,24,30].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Integrating Variability Modeling of Products, Processes, and Resources in Cyber-Physical Production Systems Engineering

Meixner

2020

Proceedings of the 24th ACM International Systems and Software Product Line Conference - Volume B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Industry 4.0 initiative envisions the flexible and optimized production of customized products on Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPSs) that consist of subsystems coordinated to conduct complex production processes. Hence, accurate CPPS modeling requires integrating the modeling of variability for Product-Process-Resource (PPR) aspects. Yet, current variability modeling approaches treat structural and behavioral variability separately, leading to inaccurate CPPS production models that impede CPPS engineering and optimization. This paper proposes a PhD project for integrated variability modeling of PPR aspects to improve the accuracy of production models with variability for CPPS engineers and production optimizers. The research project follows the Design Science approach aiming for the iterative design and evaluation of (a) a framework to categorize currently incomplete and scattered models and methods for PPR variability modeling as a foundation for an integrated model; and (b) a modeling approach for more accurate integrated PPR variability modeling. The planned research will provide the Software Product Line (SPL) and CPPS engineering research communities with (a) novel models, methods, and insights on integrated PPR variability modeling, (b) open data from CPPS engineering use cases for common modeling, and (c) empirical data from field studies for shared analysis and evaluation. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Software product lines.

show abstract

Context-sensitive reconfiguration of collaborative manufacturing systems

Cited by 9 publications

References 10 publications

Digital Twin Framework for Reconfiguration Management: Concept & Evaluation

Digital Twin Framework for Reconfiguration Management: Concept & Evaluation

An analysis of capability meta-models for expressing dynamic business transformation

Integrating Variability Modeling of Products, Processes, and Resources in Cyber-Physical Production Systems Engineering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About