2012
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2012.656851
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-specific control and the Stroop negative priming effect

Abstract: The present study highlights the utility of context-specific learning for different probe types in accounting for the commonly observed dependence of negative priming on probe selection. Using a Stroop priming procedure, Experiments 1a and 1b offered a demonstration that Stroop priming effects can differ qualitatively for selection and no-selection probes when probe selection is manipulated between subjects, but not when it is manipulated randomly from trial to trial within subject (see also Moore, 1994). In E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Item/context-specific proportion congruent effects appear to be quite robust, as they have now also been reported in a picture-word Stroop task (Bugg et al, 2011), a consecutive trial variant of the Stroop task (Milliken et al, 2012), the flanker task (Lehle and Hübner, 2008), and a global-local letter identification task (Shedden et al, 2013). For a recent review of proportion congruency effects, see Bugg and Crump (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Item/context-specific proportion congruent effects appear to be quite robust, as they have now also been reported in a picture-word Stroop task (Bugg et al, 2011), a consecutive trial variant of the Stroop task (Milliken et al, 2012), the flanker task (Lehle and Hübner, 2008), and a global-local letter identification task (Shedden et al, 2013). For a recent review of proportion congruency effects, see Bugg and Crump (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This Stroop effect can be measured by the difference in RT to incongruent items (i.e., the word “red” in green) and congruent items (i.e., the word “red” in red). Stroop-type tasks have been relied upon by researchers to measure and explore the processes related to reading (Brown et al, 2002), attention (Besner and Stolz, 1999; Roberts and Besner, 2005), as well as learning and automaticity (Crump et al, 2006; Milliken et al, 2012), to name a few.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors argued that in the typical NP task with 1/3 attended repetition, 1/3 ignored repetition, and 1/3 control trials participants can strategically use the contingency between prime and probe stimuli (in 2/3 of trials the probe target was displayed at the prime), particularly if the probe selection is easy (no distractors present). Thus, the fact that NP diminishes without probe distractors is due to participants' having enhanced cognitive resources so that they can exploit contingencies in a strategic way (see also Milliken, Thomson, Bleile, MacLellan, & Giammarco, 2012).…”
Section: What Are the Neural And Electrophysiological Correlates Of Np?mentioning
confidence: 99%