1991
DOI: 10.4135/9781412983785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through personal accounts across a 20-year period in Northern Ireland, it became apparent that people experience the effects of trauma many years after the events. Considering the reasons for long-term effects of trauma and to bridge the gap between this kind of individualistic microlevel analysis and a more general macrolevel analysis, we used a contextual analysis framework (Iversen, 1991;Kawachi, Kennedy, & Glass, 1999) developed by Dillenburger and Keenan (2005) that included trauma-related factors, individual variables, level of social support, and cultural/societal factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through personal accounts across a 20-year period in Northern Ireland, it became apparent that people experience the effects of trauma many years after the events. Considering the reasons for long-term effects of trauma and to bridge the gap between this kind of individualistic microlevel analysis and a more general macrolevel analysis, we used a contextual analysis framework (Iversen, 1991;Kawachi, Kennedy, & Glass, 1999) developed by Dillenburger and Keenan (2005) that included trauma-related factors, individual variables, level of social support, and cultural/societal factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individualistic fallacy occurs when population patterns of outcomes of interest are erroneously presumed to be explained only by individual-level characteristics. One strategy to avoid this bias, chiefly used in social science research, is contextual analysis and multilevel or hierarchical models (15,20,38,78). In this approach, models use both individual-and group-level data to examine how each contributes to the individual-level outcome of interest.…”
Section: Neighborhoodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33 This perspective seeks to extend epidemiologic frameworks beyond the "individualization of risk" (i.e., the attribution of risk to behavioral, attitudinal, personality, or other traits of individuals) to environmental or social context influences affecting populations. [34][35][36] An important example of contextual analysis in HIV prevention research among IDUs is Kaplan and Heimer's 37,38 circulation theory, which posits and has found evidence supporting the hypothesis that the shorter the time a syringe remains in circulation on the street, the less likely it will transmit HIV or hepatitis. Susser 39 has termed this type of approach a mixed study because it investigates the effects of independent context variables on individual-level dependent variables (e.g., HIV infection).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%