2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2016.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual fear conditioning induces differential alternative splicing

Abstract: The process of memory consolidation requires transcription and translation to form long-term memories. Significant effort has been dedicated to understanding changes in hippocampal gene expression after contextual fear conditioning. However, alternative splicing by differential transcript regulation during this time period has received less attention. Here, we use RNA-seq to determine exon-level changes in expression after contextual fear conditioning and retrieval. Our work reveals that a short variant of Hom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our RNA-Seq results from the WT group comparison (learning versus homecage) supports the present literature that learning induces CREB and CREM target genes that both interact with CBP for its transactivation (12,78,79). Among the CREB downstream genes, we found several activity-dependent genes (such as Arc, Egr1, Fos, Nr4a1, JunB) that previously have been shown upregulated following hippocampus-dependent learning (31,80,81). It is noteworthy that some of these activity-dependent genes were downregulated in CBP KIX/KIX mice, including Nr4a1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Our RNA-Seq results from the WT group comparison (learning versus homecage) supports the present literature that learning induces CREB and CREM target genes that both interact with CBP for its transactivation (12,78,79). Among the CREB downstream genes, we found several activity-dependent genes (such as Arc, Egr1, Fos, Nr4a1, JunB) that previously have been shown upregulated following hippocampus-dependent learning (31,80,81). It is noteworthy that some of these activity-dependent genes were downregulated in CBP KIX/KIX mice, including Nr4a1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Because there is a bias toward alternative promoters, we hypothesized that they may be driving alternative exon usage or splicing. To test this, we looked at the relationship between learning- regulated promoters and genes that show differential exon usage independently from global differential expression we previously defined (20). In this case, there was a highly significant enrichment for alternative spliced genes 30 min after fear conditioning ( P < 0.001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning-regulated promoters disproportionately overlap with those active during forebrain development in mice and are enriched in epigenetic modifications that are hallmarks of bivalent promoters, typically considered to poise expression of developmental genes (18). We then combined the results of our chromatin accessibility study with learning-induced genome-wide gene expression data [RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)] that we have previously generated (19, 20). Our results suggest that the relationship between changes in chromatin state and changes in gene expression is complex, with a highly significant enrichment of learning-regulated promoters relative to alternative splicing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over recent years, it has become clear that neuronal development is highly influenced by AS, both in mammals (Vuong et al 2016) and flies (Liu and Bossing 2016;Olesnicky et al 2017), even at the single-cell level (Liu and Bossing 2016;Liu et al 2017). More importantly, a growing body of evidence shows that behavioral traits are fine-tuned by AS in many species (Poplawski et al 2016;Tomioka et al 2016;Wang et al 2016).…”
Section: Splicing and The Brainmentioning
confidence: 99%