2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2005.10.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
279
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(289 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
6
279
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Since actual decisions are often oneshot and made in the presence of both irrelevant and relevant information, this suggests that experimental explorations of consistency using a within subject design should control for order effects to improve accuracy of results. Hence studies which only expose subjects first to relevant information, and then to all information, relevant as well as irrelevant, without counterbalancing, such as Dror, Charlton and Péron [3], may be overstating the degree of inconsistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since actual decisions are often oneshot and made in the presence of both irrelevant and relevant information, this suggests that experimental explorations of consistency using a within subject design should control for order effects to improve accuracy of results. Hence studies which only expose subjects first to relevant information, and then to all information, relevant as well as irrelevant, without counterbalancing, such as Dror, Charlton and Péron [3], may be overstating the degree of inconsistency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, such effects have also been demonstrated in studies using experts as subjects. Dror, Charlton and Péron [3] for example showed that fingerprint experts could change decisions regarding identification of subjects once presented with extraneous information. Jørgensen and Grimstad [9] similarly showed that estimates by expert software developers of time required for software development could depend on the presence of irrelevant information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two empirical field studies of this sort have been conducted Dror, Charlton, & Péron, 2006;see Dror & Rosenthal, 2008, for their metaanalysis). The first study used the Mayfield case to provide a context that suggested that two similar prints were not from the same source.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Exposure to such domain-irrelevant information has a demonstrated tendency to shape the interpretation of the analyst, even in circumstances where the underlying techniques are (otherwise) demonstrably reliable (Dror, Charlton and Peron 2006). The failure to disclose (or address) threats from contextual biases and cognitive processing is compounded to the extent that incriminating opinions are often represented as independent corroboration of guilt (Cunliffe 2013;Edmond, Searston, Tangen and Dror 2013).…”
Section: Reliability and Technological Determinismmentioning
confidence: 99%