Contextual Inquiry

Hartson, Rex; Pyla, Partha S.

doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-385241-0.00003-8

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Gurzick and Lutters present eight design guidelines for online community design, which they illustrate in the case of the online community called ''Fieldtrip'' [29]. Finally, Preece et al [32] apply Nielsen's [40] usability heuristics for the design of an online health community, combining them with their own developed ''sociability heuristics'' which provide a stepwise iterative process for improving communities from a member's perspective. Drawing on these sources, we compiled a set of heuristics that: compiles design advice relevant to crowdsourcing; removes duplication; and adopts consistent phrasing and abstraction level.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community heuristics for user interface evaluation of crowdsourcing platforms

Campo

Khan

Papangelis

et al. 2019

Future Generation Computer Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the "Taverne" license above, please follow below link for the End User Agreement:

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Community heuristics for user interface evaluation of crowdsourcing platforms

Campo

Khan

Papangelis

et al. 2019

Future Generation Computer Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Augmented Reality of 3D Content Application in Common Operational Picture Training System for Army

Mao¹,

Chen

2021

International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems

Wronikowska

Malycha

Morgan

et al. 2021

Evaluation Clinical Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objectives: Electronic healthcare records have become central to patient care. Evaluation of new systems include a variety of usability evaluation methods or usability metrics (often referred to interchangeably as usability components or usability attributes). This study reviews the breadth of usability evaluation methods, metrics, and associated measurement techniques that have been reported to assess systems designed for hospital staff to assess inpatient clinical condition.Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology, we searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Open Grey from 1986 to 2019. For included studies, we recorded usability evaluation methods or usability metrics as appropriate, and any measurement techniques applied to illustrate these. We classified and described all usability evaluation methods, usability metrics, and measurement techniques. Study quality was evaluated using a modified Downs and Black checklist. Results:The search identified 1336 studies. After abstract screening, 130 full texts were reviewed. In the 51 included studies 11 distinct usability evaluation methods were identified. Within these usability evaluation methods, seven usability metrics were reported.The most common metrics were ISO9241-11 and Nielsen's components. An additional "usefulness" metric was reported in almost 40% of included studies. We identified 70 measurement techniques used to evaluate systems. Overall study quality was reflected in a mean modified Downs and Black checklist score of 6.8/10 (range 1-9) 33% studies classified as "high-quality" (scoring eight or higher), 51% studies "moderate-quality" (scoring 6-7), and the remaining 16% (scoring below five) were "low-quality." Conclusion:There is little consistency within the field of electronic health record systems evaluation. This review highlights the variability within usability methods, metrics,

show abstract

Contextual Inquiry

Cited by 5 publications

References 1 publication

Community heuristics for user interface evaluation of crowdsourcing platforms

Community heuristics for user interface evaluation of crowdsourcing platforms

Augmented Reality of 3D Content Application in Common Operational Picture Training System for Army

Systematic review of applied usability metrics within usability evaluation methods for hospital electronic healthcare record systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About