2011
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.4040-11.2011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual Knowledge Configures Attentional Control Networks

Abstract: Contextual cues are predictive and provide behaviorally relevant information; they are not the main objective of the current task but can make behavior more efficient. Using fMRI, we investigated the brain networks involved in representing contextual information and translating it into an attentional control signal. Human subjects performed a visual search task for a low-contrast target accompanied by a single non-target that was either perceptually similar or more salient (i.e., higher contrast). Shorter reac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
80
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
5
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, the right TPJ might support the same function in all number and continuous quantity tasks, for instance, comparison processes may be a point of convergence between these tasks (Cantlon et al, 2009). More specifically, the number and the continuous quantity tasks imply the preparation and maintenance of a target-stimulus template to be compared with the actual target, that is, a matching or mismatching process, which is linked to the left and right TPJ area (DiQuattro & Geng, 2011;Doricchi, Macci, Silvetti, & Macaluso, 2010;Kincade et al, 2005). This comparison or matching process may be different in the luminance task, possibly because information about luminance could be obtained directly from every local part of the stimulus line (Gilchrist & Radonjić, 2009).…”
Section: One or Multiple Quantity Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the right TPJ might support the same function in all number and continuous quantity tasks, for instance, comparison processes may be a point of convergence between these tasks (Cantlon et al, 2009). More specifically, the number and the continuous quantity tasks imply the preparation and maintenance of a target-stimulus template to be compared with the actual target, that is, a matching or mismatching process, which is linked to the left and right TPJ area (DiQuattro & Geng, 2011;Doricchi, Macci, Silvetti, & Macaluso, 2010;Kincade et al, 2005). This comparison or matching process may be different in the luminance task, possibly because information about luminance could be obtained directly from every local part of the stimulus line (Gilchrist & Radonjić, 2009).…”
Section: One or Multiple Quantity Systems?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This self-expansion affected the perceptual processing of the stimuli consistent with the selftagged stimuli being perceptually more salient (6). The processing of salient information in the environment is suggested to involve the bilateral ventral frontoparietal attentional network (29,30), with the left hemisphere (e.g., the temporoparietal junction and the frontal eye fields) specifically involved in processing salient information based on its potential behavioral relevance (31). Interestingly the posterior part of the ventral attentional network partly overlaps with regions that process social cues (refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The TPJ response to valid targets has been related to the late coding of the "match" between the expected and the actual position of these targets (Doricchi et al, 2010). This function also allows evaluating contextual associations between cues and targets (DiQuattro & Geng, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%