2018
DOI: 10.1057/s41269-018-0120-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual-level unemployment and support for radical-right parties: a meta-analysis

Abstract: Contextual-level unemployment and support for radical-right parties: a meta-analysis Sipma, T.; Lubbers, M.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 We also add the share of residents with a university degree in the respondent’s home IRIS. This allows us to control for possible contextual effects which have been linked in the previous literature to radical right support, such as unemployment (Sipma & Lubbers, 2020) and education (Van Wijk et al, 2019). More specifically, it also allows us to check if—in addition to the halo effect—there is evidence of independent contextual effects from immigration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 We also add the share of residents with a university degree in the respondent’s home IRIS. This allows us to control for possible contextual effects which have been linked in the previous literature to radical right support, such as unemployment (Sipma & Lubbers, 2020) and education (Van Wijk et al, 2019). More specifically, it also allows us to check if—in addition to the halo effect—there is evidence of independent contextual effects from immigration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, a recent meta-analysis found that out of a total of 291 tests of the association between immigration shares and far-right voting at the sub-national level, 36% of the analyses report a positive effect, 14% a negative effect, while the rest of the studies find no association (Amengay and Stockemer 2018). A similar meta-analysis found that the effect of unemployment on support for the far right was also inconsistent across studies (Sipma and Lubbers 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in recent decades, it has also been suggested that the shifting of political conflicts toward, for example, an emphasis on environmental issues and immigration has established a political cleavage among the new political parties, namely the Right-Wing populists, the Greens, and the so called New-Left or eco-socialist parties (Arter, 2012;Kriesi, 2010;Norris & Inglehart, 2019;Oesch, 2012). Particularly in the Nordic countries, macroeconomic factors, such as employment, do not entirely explain the popularity of Right-Wing populist parties (Sipma & Lubbers, 2018) or the social correlates of political party preferences (Koivula, 2019). This is also a central argument for why we should examine party preference as a separate element apart from the social position.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%