2013
DOI: 10.5721/eujrs20134618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextual PolSAR image classification using fractal dimension and support vector machines

Abstract: In this paper, a new classification scheme of polarimetric synthetic aperture radar (PolSAR) images using fractal dimension as contextual information is proposed. Support vector machines (SVM) due to their ability to handle the nonlinear classifier problem are applied to a new fractal feature vector, which is constructed from Pauli decomposed vector and fractal dimensions. Fractal dimension is computed based on the concepts of fractional Brownian motion (fBm) and wavelet multi-resolution analysis using a self-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, several features can be selected and fused into the framework easily. For the future, the classification framework can be improved by: 1) using other information and dissimilarity measures may be more suitable or complementary, such as more complicated statistical models [Vasile et al, 2010], more components of reduced features, scattering mechanisms, texture and features like fractal information in the image [Aghababaee et al, 2013]; 2) Considering the methods that employ the edge information as well as the covariance matrix information are very interesting for over-segment generation. Moreover, In order to create a fully unsupervised classification framework, the clusters that obtain from the game theory can be merged without user intervention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, several features can be selected and fused into the framework easily. For the future, the classification framework can be improved by: 1) using other information and dissimilarity measures may be more suitable or complementary, such as more complicated statistical models [Vasile et al, 2010], more components of reduced features, scattering mechanisms, texture and features like fractal information in the image [Aghababaee et al, 2013]; 2) Considering the methods that employ the edge information as well as the covariance matrix information are very interesting for over-segment generation. Moreover, In order to create a fully unsupervised classification framework, the clusters that obtain from the game theory can be merged without user intervention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, the over-segments are generated using the adapted k-means and region merging are performed using these three algorithms. The ground truth of the San Francisco image gleaned from [Aghababaee et al, 2013], which contains 4040 urban pixels, 4897 ocean pixels and 3514 vegetation pixels. In the preprocessing operation, this PolSAR image is processed with the IDAN refined filter [Vasile et al, 2006].…”
Section: Experiments Using Airsar Imagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the CNN is good at dealing with color images, so the Pauli RGB image is suitable. For these reasons, many classification algorithms use the Pauli RGB image as their input [16,17], and so does our method.…”
Section: Generating Pauli Rgb Image To Obtain the Spatial Featurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support vector machines (SVMs) are superior image classification techniques in airborne and satellite imagery, applying a set of machine learning algorithms and having their roots in statistical learning theory (Erfanifard et al 2014). Due to its ability to handle the nonlinear classifier problem, SVM is able to go beyond the limitations of linear learning machines by implementation of the kernel function, which paves the way to find a nonlinear decision function (Aghababaee et al 2013). User accuracies and producer accuracies of all of classifications are presented in Tables 1, 2 and 3.…”
Section: Data Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%