“…These teams typically relied on regular contact (i.e., meetings, conferences, and focus groups) to discuss and resolve challenges in research design and at other stages of the projects. The formation of advisory groups, comprised of both academic and community participants, was common in research with Indigenous Peoples (e.g., McWhirter, Mununggirritj, Marika, Dickinson, & Condon, ; Novins et al, ; Palacios & Kennedy, ; Richards & Mousseau, ; Smith, Christopher, & McCormick, ), HIV/AIDS‐focused studies (e.g., Abelsohn et al, ; Andrasik et al, ; Baptiste et al, ; Burkhalter et al, ; DiStefano et al, ; Nyamathi et al, ; Vallely et al, ), and research with older adults (e.g., Guo & Phillips, ; Klemm, Rempusheski, & Teixeira, ; Ottmann, Laragy, Allen, & Feldman, ; Perry & Ziemba, ; Scharlach & Sanchez, ; West & Graham, ; Wethington et al, ). These efforts were sometimes described as attempts to address inherent power imbalances between university researchers and participants (e.g., Tobias, Richmond & Luginaah, ).…”