2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-74036-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextualized Questionnaire for Investigating Conceptions of the Nature of Science: Procedure and Principles for Elaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire was developed in accordance with literature recommendations (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). The development phases followed the methodology proposed by Kishore et al (38) and Azevedo and Scarpa (39). An advisory committee consisting of three of the authors (DGM, GPRL, and CMRG) was established.…”
Section: Phase 1: Development Of the Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was developed in accordance with literature recommendations (33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38). The development phases followed the methodology proposed by Kishore et al (38) and Azevedo and Scarpa (39). An advisory committee consisting of three of the authors (DGM, GPRL, and CMRG) was established.…”
Section: Phase 1: Development Of the Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though there is a wealth of studies on argumentation and sense-making in science education, and an increasing number of papers advocating for the explicit teaching of the nature of science (Azevedo & Scarpa, 2018), the significance of developing reasoning skills associated with the evaluation of evidence and the construction of evidence-based explanations has not received enough attention in the field of science education (Sandoval et al, 2014). Chin and Kayalvizhi (2002) argued that "the ability to reason well about complex models of data is essential not only for scientists but for nonscientists as well" (p. 213).…”
Section: Concluding Remarks and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%