2000
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6696(200023)36:4<429::aid-jhbs8>3.3.co;2-h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextualizing Floyd Allports's Social Psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7 One question raised by this third account is whether Floyd Allport's treatment of personality as a topic of social psychology was a novel approach, as the first two explanations claim. Allport's conception of social psychology was influenced by Hugo Münsterberg (see Parkovnick, 2000), whose text (Münsterberg, 1914) divided "causal" (experimental) psychology into sections on individual and social psychology. Allport's conception of social psychology was influenced by Hugo Münsterberg (see Parkovnick, 2000), whose text (Münsterberg, 1914) divided "causal" (experimental) psychology into sections on individual and social psychology.…”
Section: Personality As a Topic In Social Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 One question raised by this third account is whether Floyd Allport's treatment of personality as a topic of social psychology was a novel approach, as the first two explanations claim. Allport's conception of social psychology was influenced by Hugo Münsterberg (see Parkovnick, 2000), whose text (Münsterberg, 1914) divided "causal" (experimental) psychology into sections on individual and social psychology. Allport's conception of social psychology was influenced by Hugo Münsterberg (see Parkovnick, 2000), whose text (Münsterberg, 1914) divided "causal" (experimental) psychology into sections on individual and social psychology.…”
Section: Personality As a Topic In Social Psychologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Greenwood demonstrates (andParkovnick, 2000, andBarenbaum, 2000, also point out), Floyd Allport (1924) was an active spokesperson for the rejection of the notion of the collective mind or the group consciousness or the supraindividual group mind, which he called group fallacy. It was an error, according to Allport, to attempt to explain social phenomena in terms of group entity.…”
Section: The Two Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning around World War I, Gordon Allport was largely present, and professionally active, during much of the period when social psychology was becoming defined in North America, and elsewhere, and institutionalized as a field (see Barenbaum, 2000;Cherry, 2000;Chung, 2000;Danziger, 2000;Greenwood, 2000;Nicholson, 2000;Parkovnick, 2000). Prior to his death in 1967, he had monitored the methodological changes and the reactions of social psychology to the rising tide of experimentation.…”
Section: Will the Real Gordon Allport Please Stand Up? Two Divergent mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For discussions of psychologistic, methodological, political, and moralistic individualisms within social psychology, seeLubek, 1993b;Barenbaum, 2000;Chung, 2000;Danziger, 2000;Greenwood, 2000;Nicholson, 2000;Parkovnick, 2000. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%