2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contextualizing the rural in digital studies: A computational literature review of rural-digital relations

Qian Zhang,
Natasha A. Webster,
Shengnan Han
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study thus advocates for digital platforms to associate themselves with a heightened sensitivity to the complexity and multifaceted characteristics of rural contexts, and to recognise the rural as a distinct assemblage of social, economic and cultural practices (Zhang et al., 2023). It is emphasised that digital platforms are not necessarily moored in a ‘periphery‐centre’ typology that constantly reproduces the ethos of technological use in developed and urban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study thus advocates for digital platforms to associate themselves with a heightened sensitivity to the complexity and multifaceted characteristics of rural contexts, and to recognise the rural as a distinct assemblage of social, economic and cultural practices (Zhang et al., 2023). It is emphasised that digital platforms are not necessarily moored in a ‘periphery‐centre’ typology that constantly reproduces the ethos of technological use in developed and urban areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some emerging enterprises of rural digitalisation have illuminated the interface between the rural and digital platforms and questioned the ‘digital divide’. The ‘digital divide’ is reflected in the accounts of inequalities in accessing ICTs, broadband and digital infrastructure (Pant & Odame, 2017; Roberts et al., 2017; Rotz et al., 2019), as well as advocacy for digital inclusion, which highlights rural communities' limited ability to engage with effectively and benefit from digital advancements due to the lack of cultural capital and educational disparities (Koo & Eesley, 2021; Zhang et al., 2023). With this political‐economic logic of the ‘digital divide’, the rural is trapped in a quagmire of ‘hinterlands as operational landscapes of the digital growth machine’, which incorporates the rural into its process of capital accumulation, transforming it into a hinterland for the colonisation of digital technologies, further reshaping and creating asymmetrical power relations between the rural and the urban (Rosen & León, 2022, 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%