1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3468(91)90713-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results have been reported to be good by some authors who conclude that normal bowel function after internal sphincter-saving PSARP may be expected in a significant proportion of children with high or intermediate anorectal anomalies [8]. On the other hand, few authors feel that although PSARP provides a good aesthetic result, patients will never acquire normal continence [9]. But this bias opinion could be avoided if the results are being evaluated by a separate team not involved in that surgery, as we have done in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results have been reported to be good by some authors who conclude that normal bowel function after internal sphincter-saving PSARP may be expected in a significant proportion of children with high or intermediate anorectal anomalies [8]. On the other hand, few authors feel that although PSARP provides a good aesthetic result, patients will never acquire normal continence [9]. But this bias opinion could be avoided if the results are being evaluated by a separate team not involved in that surgery, as we have done in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the recent advances in operative techniques, the long-term prognosis in intermediate and high type ARM remains poor. Thirty to fifty-six percent of patients have significant faecal soiling after surgery [1,3,4]. Post-operative bowel management programme (BMP) including dietary advice, toilet training [5], medications [6], rectal or antegrade colonic enema [7,8] was useful in maintaining bowel continence in these children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27][28][29] Rectosphincteric reflex was found in 17.1% of the 82 patients examined. When the patient groups were analyzed separately, we observed that rectosphincteric reflex was detected in 35.5% of the continent children, 4.8% of the partially continent and 6.7% of the incontinent children, i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%