1983
DOI: 10.1029/tc002i004p00357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continental hypsography

Abstract: We have used average continental elevations for 1‐degree‐square areas to construct detailed continental hypsographic curves. The curves available up to the present have been those prepared by Kossinna, but they suffer from some drawbacks, the most important being that the elevation interval is for the most part 1 km, which does not allow for very detailed work. Consequently, we have given data for each 0.1 km interval of elevation. The availability of the data on tapes allowed us also to make calculations of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Slope analyses for the earth have been carried out by Moore and Mark (1986) and will be briefly discussed later. Harrison et al (1983). + From Hay and Southam (1977).…”
Section: Mechanical Loadmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Slope analyses for the earth have been carried out by Moore and Mark (1986) and will be briefly discussed later. Harrison et al (1983). + From Hay and Southam (1977).…”
Section: Mechanical Loadmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This surface elevation distribution is commonly used (e.g. Harrison et al, 1983;Rosenblatt and Pinet, 1994) for topographic comparisons because it gives three-dimensional information for a two-dimensional approach. The integral of this curve with respect to relative height provides a simple morphological index of the elevation distribution within the area considered (Ohmori, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, hypsometric analysis is essential tool to assess the impact of lithology, tectonics and climate on landform change, and to evaluate the interaction between tectonic uplift and erosion over an area or watershed. The hypsometric curve represents the volume of rock mass in the watershed against the remaining mass [65] [66] [67], whereas, the hypsometric integral is calculated from the area under a hypsometric curve and expressed as a percentage, where its value varies from 0 to 1 [68]. The hypsometric curves of W. Wala and the 10 sub-watersheds selected for the purpose of further analysis are convex upward, which is indicative of the youth-age stage of geomorphic development.…”
Section: Hypsometric Integral (Hi)mentioning
confidence: 99%