2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2020.106509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continental lithospheric temperatures: A review

Abstract: Thermal structure of the lithosphere exerts a primary control on its strength and density and thereby its dynamic evolution as the outer thermal and mechanic boundary layer of the convecting mantle. This contribution focuses on continental lithosphere. We review constraints on thermal conductivity and heat production, geophysical and geochemical/petrological constraints on thermal structure of the continental lithosphere, as well as steady-state and non-steady state 1D thermal models and their applicability. C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
(312 reference statements)
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, there may be an effect of the different H 2 O content and the change from spinel to garnet phases, giving a difference in the velocity‐temperature relation across the LAB. Although there have been recent improvements, there are still absolute temperature uncertainties of at least ±50°C (e.g., Goes, Govers, & Vacher, 2000; Goes, Hasterok, et al., 2020; Jackson & Faul, 2010; McCarthy et al., 2011; Porter et al., 2019). Most recent estimates of temperature from tomography velocities indicate 1,300°C–1,400°C at 60–70 km where partial melt is not inferred (e.g., Goes, Hasterok, et al., 2020; Goes & van der Lee, 2002; Hansen et al., 2015; Klocking et al., 2018) (Figures 7 and 8), which agrees with the common Cordillera upper asthenosphere mantle solidus at 60–70 km from studies of volcanic geochemistry.…”
Section: Asthenosphere Temperatures and Partial Melt From Seismic Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, there may be an effect of the different H 2 O content and the change from spinel to garnet phases, giving a difference in the velocity‐temperature relation across the LAB. Although there have been recent improvements, there are still absolute temperature uncertainties of at least ±50°C (e.g., Goes, Govers, & Vacher, 2000; Goes, Hasterok, et al., 2020; Jackson & Faul, 2010; McCarthy et al., 2011; Porter et al., 2019). Most recent estimates of temperature from tomography velocities indicate 1,300°C–1,400°C at 60–70 km where partial melt is not inferred (e.g., Goes, Hasterok, et al., 2020; Goes & van der Lee, 2002; Hansen et al., 2015; Klocking et al., 2018) (Figures 7 and 8), which agrees with the common Cordillera upper asthenosphere mantle solidus at 60–70 km from studies of volcanic geochemistry.…”
Section: Asthenosphere Temperatures and Partial Melt From Seismic Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of heat production values in the crust, in particular in sediments and upper crust, also has strong effect on the thermal model (Artemieva & Mooney, 2001; Goes et al, 2020). This information is largely unavailable for the NCC.…”
Section: Lithosphere Thermal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such studies remain very sparse in the NCC. In the absence of a regional-scale database, we follow a commonly adopted strategy (Artemieva & Mooney, 2001;Balling, 1995;Furlong & Chapman, 2013;Goes et al, 2020;Jaupart & Mareschal, 1999;Mareschal, 1991). For each crustal layer (their thickness is constrained by a high-resolution regional crustal model NCcrust; Xia et al, 2017) and the LM, we adopt standard values of heat production (Artemieva & Mooney, 2001;Ashwal et al, 1987;Balling, 1995;Fountain et al, 1987;Gard et al, 2019;Jaupart & Mareschal, 1999;Pinet & Jaupart, 1987;Rudnick et al, 1998) and thermal conductivity (Cermak & Rybach, 1982;Clauser & Huenges, 2013;G.-Z.…”
Section: Lithosphere Geothermsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors that control the depth and structure of the LAB remain unclear, as are the time and process of lithosphere thinning surmised to have occurred in the back arc of this and many other convergent continental margins (Currie & Hyndman, 2006;Wang & Currie, 2015).Subduction for the past ∼50 Myr beneath the Canadian Cordillera (CC) has been cut off by the Queen Charlotte fault zone (Figure 1), but recently enough that high back arc temperatures have not decreased significantly. The inception and longevity of a hot thin mantle lithosphere beneath this and other convergent continental margins bears on the dynamics of mobile belts (Goes et al, 2019;Hyndman, 2019). One view has thin upper crust decoupled from weak lower crust and lithospheric mantle, propagating stress far in-board from the active convergent margin (Hyndman, 2017) whereas other models have a distribution of stress throughout the whole lithosphere (Finzel et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%