2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.22.473714
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continental-scale hyperspectral tree species classification in the United States National Ecological Observatory Network

Abstract: Advances in remote sensing imagery and computer vision applications unlock the potential for developing algorithms to classify individual trees from remote sensing at unprecedented scales. However, most approaches to date focus on site-specific applications and a small number of taxonomic groups. This limitation makes it hard to evaluate whether these approaches generalize well across broader geographic areas and ecosystems. Leveraging field surveys and hyperspectral remote sensing data from the National Ecolo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These 14 species represent almost 90% of all stems present at the site and include rare species representing less than 1% of the individual trees on the landscape. Compared to the single-site OSBS model created from NEON woody vegetation structure data alone (Marconi et al 2022, evaluation accuracy in Table S2), we doubled the species number predicted by incorporating auxiliary, non-NEON data. As a result, 25% of crowns predicted at OSBS in this study were of species not included in previous efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These 14 species represent almost 90% of all stems present at the site and include rare species representing less than 1% of the individual trees on the landscape. Compared to the single-site OSBS model created from NEON woody vegetation structure data alone (Marconi et al 2022, evaluation accuracy in Table S2), we doubled the species number predicted by incorporating auxiliary, non-NEON data. As a result, 25% of crowns predicted at OSBS in this study were of species not included in previous efforts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important methodological change from previous tree species classification workflows is that we generated crown predictions for evaluation using an RGB crown detection model independent from the field labeled trees.This approach reflects the process during prediction in which field stem points are not available. The majority of previous papers use fixed size boxes around field stem points or hand-drawn crown polygons on the imagery to generate both training and evaluation data (Maschler et al 2018, Scholl et al 2020, Onishi et al 2022, Marconi et al 2022). This crown delineation approach biases results towards higher accuracy as field points are most often collected on the largest and easiest to differentiate individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Remote sensing data are increasingly being used to circumvent the limitations of traditional field-based forest inventories. While species classifications have successfully used light detection and ranging (LiDAR) and multispectral images, complex cases often rely on airborne imaging spectroscopy to achieve sufficient accuracies [8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Despite the potential of these data to operationally map plant species across large geographic regions, classification studies using imaging spectroscopy are often limited to small geographic regions [10,12,13], and thus the effects of intra-specific spectral variability, driven by variation in canopy traits, on classification accuracies remains underexplored [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%