1967
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(67)90116-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contingent negative variation and evoked responses recorded by radio-telemetry in free-ranging subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4). A larger increase of the slow wave in the 9R− group may thus reflect stronger readiness (Walter et al. , 1967) whenever there is a sensory match between new and old auditory stimuli, resulting in a more efficient integration of the meaning of a new sound stimulus into the ongoing task context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). A larger increase of the slow wave in the 9R− group may thus reflect stronger readiness (Walter et al. , 1967) whenever there is a sensory match between new and old auditory stimuli, resulting in a more efficient integration of the meaning of a new sound stimulus into the ongoing task context.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is, expectancy was defined as the "subjective probability" or relative certainty that S 2 will follow 8! (Walter et al, 1967). Consequently, with S 2 omission there was presumed to be a decrease in "the probability of signal association as estimated by the subject [Walter, 1964b, p.…”
Section: Stimulus Withdrawalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) was for the first time described by Walter (1964a,b) and is characterised as a sustained potential change (involving mainly the frontal cortex) during which the surface of the brain becomes electro-negative by about 20 ȝV with respect to remote reference electrode or deeper structures (Walter et al, 1967). It is a slow negative deviation of EEG activity on the scalp which occurs in the interval between warning stimulus (S1) and imperative stimulus (S2) that is followed by a mental or motor response.…”
Section: Components Of Erpsmentioning
confidence: 99%