1971
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.1971.01750070003001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contingent Negative Variation and Individual Differences A New Approach in Brain Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contingent negative variation (CNV) is sensitive to the anticipation of (and attention to) an incoming stimulus in order to prepare a subsequent behavioral response (Tecce, 1971(Tecce, , 1972. As in many previous CNV studies (Cui et al, 2000), it appeared at fronto-central sites (maximally detected at FCz as in the current study).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The contingent negative variation (CNV) is sensitive to the anticipation of (and attention to) an incoming stimulus in order to prepare a subsequent behavioral response (Tecce, 1971(Tecce, , 1972. As in many previous CNV studies (Cui et al, 2000), it appeared at fronto-central sites (maximally detected at FCz as in the current study).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The CNV, which was first described by Walter et al [1964], are event-related potentials that are evoked by a pair of stim uli, of which the first is a warning stimulus and the second is an imperative stimulus. It is thought that the CNV reflects cortical arousal, such as anticipation and anxiety to wards the coming imperative stimulus [Walter et al, 1964;Knott and Irwin, 1966;Tecce, 1971]. CNV are particularly interest ing for this study, since they can be analyzed by three different variables: the amplitude of the CNV, the reaction time of the subjects in responding to the imperative stimulus, and the number of errors subjects make in re sponding to the imperative stimulus [Ikemi et al, 1986].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of contingent negative variation (CNV) using electrical shock have indicated that the amplitude of CNV increased in subjects with low trait anxiety but did not change in those with high trait anxiety (Knott & Irwin, 1967, 1968, 1973. These findings were interpreted as meaning that subjects with high trait anxiety withdrew from electrical shock (Tecce, 1971). The difference between groups in this study might also suggest that high trait anxiety diminished the attention given to the stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%