2023
DOI: 10.1177/13634615231189565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contingent universality: The epistemic politics of global mental health

Dörte Bemme

Abstract: The field of global mental health (GMH) has undergone profound changes over the past decade. Outgrowing its earlier agenda it has performed a reflexive turn, broadened towards a social paradigm and developed new modes of knowledge production, all of which reshaped ‘mental health’ as a global object of knowledge and care, and the epistemic politics of the field. Drawing on long-term ethnographic fieldwork among GMH experts and recent agenda-setting publications, I discuss how GMH advocates and critical observer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(180 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis, for instance, did not examine in detail how the mhGAP guidelines are applied in practice within a variety of contexts; it did not examine the wider epistemic infrastructure within which the guidelines operate; and, crucially, it failed to consider the impact its diagnoses and recommendations may have on the lives and subjectivities of those affected. Despite these limitations, however, this article argues that the universality of mental disorders is contingent and partial, and the different strategies employed in GMH to address depression can be seen as "contingent universals" 85,87 upon which its main thesis is based. Most importantly, although the GMH agenda has placed significant emphasis on expanding services to reach all those who meet diagnostic criteria for common mental disorders, many of them do not consider themselves to need or want such treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis, for instance, did not examine in detail how the mhGAP guidelines are applied in practice within a variety of contexts; it did not examine the wider epistemic infrastructure within which the guidelines operate; and, crucially, it failed to consider the impact its diagnoses and recommendations may have on the lives and subjectivities of those affected. Despite these limitations, however, this article argues that the universality of mental disorders is contingent and partial, and the different strategies employed in GMH to address depression can be seen as "contingent universals" 85,87 upon which its main thesis is based. Most importantly, although the GMH agenda has placed significant emphasis on expanding services to reach all those who meet diagnostic criteria for common mental disorders, many of them do not consider themselves to need or want such treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,15,61 However, the universality achieved through the implementation of the mhGAP guidelines is always partial and contingent. [85][86][87][88] Moreover, it is pertinent to note that international guidelines are embedded and circulated within the broader GMH assemblage (crafted using rhetorical global metrics [burden], funding, EBM, etc. ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contributed to the ‘reframing’ of global mental health from a focus on the ‘treatment gap’ to mental health as a ‘global public good’ in line with the Sustainable Development Goals. In addition, a growing emphasis on decolonisation, pluralistic interventions, and an “all of society approach” to mental health care within the field of global mental health invites fundamental changes in the ways in which the problems and solutions of mental health may be conceptualised and actioned [ 9 ]. Community health systems is a term developed by Schneider and Lehman, who define them as “the set of local actors, relationships, and processes engaged in producing, advocating for, and supporting health in communities and households outside of, but existing in relationship to, formal health structures”[ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%