2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02927.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continua of specificity and virulence in plant host–pathogen interactions: causes and consequences

Abstract: Contents Summary 513 Introduction 513 Continua in plant host–pathogen interactions 514 Mechanisms underlying continua in specificity and virulence 516 Ecological consequences 519 Evolutionary patterns and processes 520 Conclusions 524 Acknowledgements 525 References 525 Summary Ecological, evolutionary and molecular models of interactions between plant hosts and microbial pathogens are largely based around a concept of tightly coupled interactions between species pairs. However, highly pathogenic and oblig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
242
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 189 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 198 publications
(267 reference statements)
2
242
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether considering multi-parasitized hosts or multi-host parasites, field studies are needed because it is clear from many host-parasite systems that environmental variation mediates host-parasite interactions (either directly by resource-dependent variation in parasite growth and host defence, or indirectly through parasite-mediated competition, and thereby fitness impacts on host). In addition, oppportunities for interspecies transmission in multi-host parasites can be greatly modulated by environmental heterogeneity (Barrett et al 2009;Hall et al 2009). Cross-disciplinary approaches, including the tools of epidemiology and animal behaviour, have proved their efficiency in understanding the spread and virulence in a natural multi-host pathogen (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether considering multi-parasitized hosts or multi-host parasites, field studies are needed because it is clear from many host-parasite systems that environmental variation mediates host-parasite interactions (either directly by resource-dependent variation in parasite growth and host defence, or indirectly through parasite-mediated competition, and thereby fitness impacts on host). In addition, oppportunities for interspecies transmission in multi-host parasites can be greatly modulated by environmental heterogeneity (Barrett et al 2009;Hall et al 2009). Cross-disciplinary approaches, including the tools of epidemiology and animal behaviour, have proved their efficiency in understanding the spread and virulence in a natural multi-host pathogen (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the emergence of new virulent diseases has occurred in cultivated plants via betweenspecies recombination in virus and fungal pathogens (references in Barrett et al (2009)). Within-host interspecific interactions may favour between-strain recombination in one of the interacting parasites, leading to more virulent or transmissible strains of parasites, as suggested by the study of Escribano et al (2001).…”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibrio are ubiquitous in the marine realm and pathogenic strains are often generalists with a broad host range [43] that encounter a vast range of resistance mechanisms from alternative host species [44]. Indeed, Vibrio communities associated with benthic marine invertebrates including oyster populations used here were not host specific and rather reflected a random assemblage of Vibrio spp.…”
Section: (A) Local Adaptation To Vibrio Communities Is Environment Dementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas networks of multiple pathogens with multiple hosts dominate natural systems (Barrett et al., 2009; Vacher, Piou, & Desprez‐Loustau, 2008), most previous work has emphasized single‐pathogen infections in a single plant species. Some recent studies have provided a window into the structure of bipartite networks of belowground plant–fungal interactions dominated by mycorrhizal fungi (e.g., Montesinos‐Navarro, Segarra‐Moragues, Valiente‐Banuet, & Verdú, 2012; Taylor et al., 2014; Toju, Guimarães, Olesen, & Thompson, 2014; Toju, Sato, et al., 2013, Toju, Yamamoto, et al., 2013), but such networks have included <2% putative pathogens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%