2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20870-7_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continual Occlusion and Optical Flow Estimation

Abstract: Two optical flow estimation problems are addressed: i) occlusion estimation and handling, and ii) estimation from image sequences longer than two frames. The proposed ContinualFlow method estimates occlusions before flow, avoiding the use of flow corrupted by occlusions for their estimation. We show that providing occlusion masks as an additional input to flow estimation improves the standard performance metric by more than 25% on both KITTI and Sintel. As a second contribution, a novel method for incorporatin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We test the accuracy of our IRR-PWC on the public Sintel [10] and KITTI [17,41] benchmarks. When fine-tuning, we use the robust training loss as in [24,52,53] [53] (1.45) (7.59%) 7.72% LiteFlowNet [24] (1.62) (5.58%) 9.38% PWC-Net [52] (2.16) (9.80%) 9.60% ContinualFlow ROB † § [42] --10.03% MirrorFlow [25] -9.98% 10.29% FlowNet2 [26] (2.30) (8.61%) 10.41% vations are that our model (i) converges much faster than the baseline and (ii) overfits to the training split less, demonstrating much better accuracy on the test set despite slightly higher error on training split. This highlights the benefit of our IRR scheme: better generalization even on the training domain as well as across datasets.…”
Section: Optical Flow Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We test the accuracy of our IRR-PWC on the public Sintel [10] and KITTI [17,41] benchmarks. When fine-tuning, we use the robust training loss as in [24,52,53] [53] (1.45) (7.59%) 7.72% LiteFlowNet [24] (1.62) (5.58%) 9.38% PWC-Net [52] (2.16) (9.80%) 9.60% ContinualFlow ROB † § [42] --10.03% MirrorFlow [25] -9.98% 10.29% FlowNet2 [26] (2.30) (8.61%) 10.41% vations are that our model (i) converges much faster than the baseline and (ii) overfits to the training split less, demonstrating much better accuracy on the test set despite slightly higher error on training split. This highlights the benefit of our IRR scheme: better generalization even on the training domain as well as across datasets.…”
Section: Optical Flow Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on machine learning principles, these algorithms learn to compute optical flow from a pair of input images. In recent years convolutional networks have been used to estimate the optical flow with promising results [23][24][25][26][27][28]30]. Convolutional neural nets can go through supervised or unsupervised training for per-pixel image classification.…”
Section: Deep Learning Based or Cnn Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among modern researchers [67] proposed a variational model with a self-adaptive weight energy function and non-local term. In this sense the most powerful schemes are those utilizing occlusions as supplementary evidence to compute optical flow such as MirrorFlow [22], ContinualFlow [28], SelFlow [30]. This approach is contrary to the classical methods applying forward/backward inconsistency check and discarding occlusions as outliers.…”
Section: Occlusionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They construct past cost volume and future cost volume with three frames and leverage convolutional neural network to reason occlusion. Neoral et al [42] also estimate occlusion masks by introducing the previous frame flow and named it Con-tinualFlow. Ren et al [43] use a neural network to fuse optical flows of different moments depending on longer-term temporal cues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%