Collaborative Curriculum Design for Sustainable Innovation and Teacher Learning 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-20062-6_20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuation of Collaborative Curriculum Design Outcomes: Teachers’ Transfer of Teaching with Technology

Abstract: The focus of most professional development projects is on achieving effects that will continue some years after the project’s termination. However, such effects are not often studied. The two studies reported in this chapter were conducted to investigate the extent to which pre-service and in-service teachers continued to use technology in their teaching after the professional development arrangement had ended. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge as a conceptual framework informed the content of the pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the students' level, following So, Chen, and Wan's framework, self-regulated learning can be an appropriate framework for the students in dealing with connectivism [37]. Practically, self-regulated learning can be used for the students to manage the use of technology and select an appropriate device in the classroom as an independent learner [38]. However, as pointed by Madsen, Archard, and Thorvaldsen, the top-down educational policy of technological utilization could trigger resistance especially in the term of teachers' acceptancy towards the educational policy [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the students' level, following So, Chen, and Wan's framework, self-regulated learning can be an appropriate framework for the students in dealing with connectivism [37]. Practically, self-regulated learning can be used for the students to manage the use of technology and select an appropriate device in the classroom as an independent learner [38]. However, as pointed by Madsen, Archard, and Thorvaldsen, the top-down educational policy of technological utilization could trigger resistance especially in the term of teachers' acceptancy towards the educational policy [39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second component pertains to the incorporation of TPACK theory. Existing literature on TPACK highlights the significance of exploring theoretical frameworks related to TPACK to foster its development [25]- [27]. Koh and Chai [28], for example, emphasized that comprehending TPACK theory must precede the cultivation of TPACK, and they stressed the importance of exploring the theoretical underpinnings of TPACK in TPACK education.…”
Section: A Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent times, the application of technology in west African higher educational institutions of learning has become central to the medium of instruction employed by the teaching staff. Although technological means of pedagogy is obtainable in many higher educational institutions of learning in Africa, innumerable problems have characterized their inability to introduce technology as a pedagogical tool in instruction (Agyei, 2021;Agyei & Kafyulilo, 2019;Antwi et al, 2018;Mikre, 2011). Hence, its implementation differs from one higher learning institution to the other as well as from one country to the other (Eke, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%