2015
DOI: 10.1038/npjbcancer.2015.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continued use of MDA-MB-435, a melanoma cell line, as a model for human breast cancer, even in year, 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact origin of MDA-MB-435s cells is under constant debate [70]. MDA-MB-435s was initially thought to be of breast cancer origin [71], and is still extensively used in breast cancer research [7280].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact origin of MDA-MB-435s cells is under constant debate [70]. MDA-MB-435s was initially thought to be of breast cancer origin [71], and is still extensively used in breast cancer research [7280].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent consensus is that the line was indeed contaminated with melanoma cells and should not be used as a breast cancer model [25].…”
Section: Short Tandem Repeat (Str)-profiling and Targeted Mutation Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the MDA-MB-435 cell line used in this study, questions have been raised that gene expression analysis of the cells produced some microarrays in which MDA-MB-435 clustered with cell lines of melanoma origin [46][47][48]. We are aware of the debate about the origin of this cell line [49] and despite these speculations, strong evidence has been presented reiterating that MDA-MB-435 is of breast cancer origin [50] and may be used as "an excellent model for studies of highly malignant and dedifferentiated breast cancers" [47]. However, we realize that discussions concerning the cell line's genetic origin are outside the scope of this paper, which focus more on demonstrating the capability of high-resolution in vivo imaging of cancer using conductivity contrasts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%