2016
DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2016.1200171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuing Education on Suicide Assessment and Crisis Intervention for Social Workers and Other Mental Health Professionals: A Follow-Up Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several continuing education programs have been developed for social work students and/or practicing social workers (Kourgiantakis et al, 2020). These include Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR; Jacobson et al, 2012b;Sharpe et al, 2014), Suicide Assessment and Intervention Training (SAIT; Mirick et al, 2016), Counseling for Access to Lethal Means (CALM; Almeida et al, 2017), Recognizing and Responding to Suicide Risk (Jacobson et al, 2012a), and Assessing and Managing Suicide Risk (Scott, 2015). Some of these courses use clinical suicide competencies (Rudd et al, 2008), while others, such as QPR, are designed for gatekeepers, not mental health professionals.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several continuing education programs have been developed for social work students and/or practicing social workers (Kourgiantakis et al, 2020). These include Question, Persuade, Refer (QPR; Jacobson et al, 2012b;Sharpe et al, 2014), Suicide Assessment and Intervention Training (SAIT; Mirick et al, 2016), Counseling for Access to Lethal Means (CALM; Almeida et al, 2017), Recognizing and Responding to Suicide Risk (Jacobson et al, 2012a), and Assessing and Managing Suicide Risk (Scott, 2015). Some of these courses use clinical suicide competencies (Rudd et al, 2008), while others, such as QPR, are designed for gatekeepers, not mental health professionals.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers also pointed out that the supportive environment or conditions of good management (Briggs & McBeath, 2009), adequate training (Martin, 2016), and effective supervision (Chiller & Crisp, 2012) benefit the performance and behavior of social workers. Specifically, the motivation and encouragement from organizations help social workers perform better in practice (Fisher, 2009); the support of supervisors could increase social workers' well‐being (Shier & Graham, 2011) and reduce burnout (Hamama, 2012); and the continuing training can be an effective approach for social workers to increase knowledge and incorporate skills into practice (Mirick et al., 2016). It is reasonable to speculate that the supportive work environment (i.e., management, training, and supervision) significantly impacts the work effectiveness of child directors.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%