1992
DOI: 10.1080/00359199209520260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuing Human Evolution: Bodies, Brains and the Role of Variability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Table 7, SA black males increased in size at 21 measurement sites, with statistically significant differences at seven of these sites namely, maximum mid-shaft diameter of the humerus, epicondylar breadth of the humerus, superior head diameter of the ulna, maximum mid-shaft diameter of the ulna, the maximum mid-shaft diameter of the femur, the proximal bicondylar breadth of the tibia, and the maximum proximal diameter of the fibula. The older SA white males were also larger in size with statistically significant differences having been noted at the inferior diameter of the head of the ulna, the proximal bicondylar breadth of the tibia and the Table 1 Year of birth of the various young (<50) and old (50) distal diameter of the radius (Table 8). However, the difference in mean size for older SA black and white males was far less than that observed in SA white females.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Table 7, SA black males increased in size at 21 measurement sites, with statistically significant differences at seven of these sites namely, maximum mid-shaft diameter of the humerus, epicondylar breadth of the humerus, superior head diameter of the ulna, maximum mid-shaft diameter of the ulna, the maximum mid-shaft diameter of the femur, the proximal bicondylar breadth of the tibia, and the maximum proximal diameter of the fibula. The older SA white males were also larger in size with statistically significant differences having been noted at the inferior diameter of the head of the ulna, the proximal bicondylar breadth of the tibia and the Table 1 Year of birth of the various young (<50) and old (50) distal diameter of the radius (Table 8). However, the difference in mean size for older SA black and white males was far less than that observed in SA white females.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Secular trends for stature in SA blacks also appear to only become a factor in more recent years, although Tobias [49] argued for the absence of a positive secular trend. Generally the world-wide trend would be for gracilization, which would imply that the younger groups (with their more recent birth dates) would be somewhat more gracile that the older groups (with their more distant birth dates) [50]. However, as the mean dates-of-birth between the various young and older groups differ from 14 (SA blacks of both sexes) to 26 (old SA white males) years only, it is unsure what the effect of this relatively short time span would be with regards to changes in robusticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistent reliability of ramus shape over time and through paleospecies will greatly enhance our ability to separate sexual dimorphism from evolutionary change. Size and proportions are known to have changed significantly through the ages-even from as recently as the begin-ning of the Holocene (Henneberg, 1988(Henneberg, , 1992. This morphologic trait is not size dependent and can therefore avoid the problems inherent in even the latest metric attempts to diagnose sex and ultimately determine the range of sexual dimorphism in small fossil samples (e.g., Plavcan, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Labels in the formula are: d x = a fraction of dying people of age x; s x = reproductive value of a person of age x (for example, s 65 = 0, while s 15 = 1). For further explanation and data see [35,70]. …”
Section: Possible Approaches In Future Em Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%