2016
DOI: 10.1484/j.vms.5.112421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Continuity and Change: Forms of Liminality in the Sacred Social Spaces of the Pre-Christian Nordic World

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…56 (154-57) relates how Egill Skalla-Grímsson visits the Gulaþing in Western Norway and sees the presumed tenth-century practice of erecting vébǫnd (vé-ropes)-a practice also described in the twelfth-century Frostuþingslǫg for Trøndelagen (127; see also . The concept vé, as noted above, is an Old Norse term for a sacral place (see Murphy 2016Murphy , 2018a; also attested in eddic poems like Grímnismál st. 13 and Lokasenna st. 51). In Egils saga, the judges are described as seated inside the vébǫnd and, furthermore, a prohibition of carrying weapons inside the vébǫnd was in place, presumably to prevent the breaking of the sacrality.…”
Section: Spatial Sacralization In Legal Contextsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…56 (154-57) relates how Egill Skalla-Grímsson visits the Gulaþing in Western Norway and sees the presumed tenth-century practice of erecting vébǫnd (vé-ropes)-a practice also described in the twelfth-century Frostuþingslǫg for Trøndelagen (127; see also . The concept vé, as noted above, is an Old Norse term for a sacral place (see Murphy 2016Murphy , 2018a; also attested in eddic poems like Grímnismál st. 13 and Lokasenna st. 51). In Egils saga, the judges are described as seated inside the vébǫnd and, furthermore, a prohibition of carrying weapons inside the vébǫnd was in place, presumably to prevent the breaking of the sacrality.…”
Section: Spatial Sacralization In Legal Contextsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is a body of scholarship seeking to demonstrate the intense variation within pre-Christian religion, arguing that different reflexes of this "same" religion may have shared certain common precepts and structures, but could differ from one another as much as any dialects of a language group (Nordberg 2012;cf. Ljungberg 1938;McKinnell 1994;Svanberg 2003;Bertell 2006;Brink 2007;Schjødt 2009;Gunnell 2015;Murphy 2016;2018a;2018b).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…employed by tightly-regulated soteriological traditions like Christianity -so-called 'world' or 'universal' religions -even important beings like deities can mean different things to different members of the same congregation. Recent studies of variation within Iron-Age European religious systems have shown that this problem is further exacerbated in henotheistic and polytheistic traditions (Murphy, 2016(Murphy, , 2017(Murphy, , 2018Nordberg, 2012;Svanberg, 2003). As such, we employ the concept of a 'semantic centre', which proposes that most supranatural beings can be argued to exhibit a single core characteristic, attribute, or association from which their other features may be derived (Schjødt, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%